Identity X
10-14-2004, 03:22 AM
Beware! This topic is mostly irrelevant to Americans and is only intended for the British.
Pro-hunt or pro-fox? I think every Briton has an opinion on this, although it only really refers to England. It's been waging war for a while now and there won't be peace just yet, so what is your take on it. Don't rely on the poll above, post your opinions/arguments!
Myself? Strongly Pro-hunt. You see, I don't live in the country but neither do I live in a sprawing city. I live in a small town, walking distance from both a Tesco megastore and a desinated area of natural beauty. It's a chichè, but we all know that anti-hunt campaigners are all from cities, mostly London. The only contact they have with nature is through glossy photographs and BBC2. They know nothing about foxes, their habitat, or their prey, only that they are 'wildlife' and must be protected.
In my opinion, humans are above other animals. We are superior. We may rely on them for food and suchlike, but if an animal adversely affects or wellbeing and prosperity, I say kill them. And it's not as if they are extinct; hunts only kill a few foxes and therefore are in no way harming the overall population. The factor that is harming the foxes is destruction of habitat involved in building cities from whence anti-hunt morons come from.
And what of 'hunting for fun'? Why not? Foxes have no 'contract' that says they cannot be killed for entertainment. Where do you think the phrase 'thrill of the hunt' came from?
I know my opinions are extreme, but it's my opinion so why can't it be? Oh, by the way I'm working class, and I'm not a toff; I actually don't like the company of toffs (as I define them).
Pro-hunt or pro-fox? I think every Briton has an opinion on this, although it only really refers to England. It's been waging war for a while now and there won't be peace just yet, so what is your take on it. Don't rely on the poll above, post your opinions/arguments!
Myself? Strongly Pro-hunt. You see, I don't live in the country but neither do I live in a sprawing city. I live in a small town, walking distance from both a Tesco megastore and a desinated area of natural beauty. It's a chichè, but we all know that anti-hunt campaigners are all from cities, mostly London. The only contact they have with nature is through glossy photographs and BBC2. They know nothing about foxes, their habitat, or their prey, only that they are 'wildlife' and must be protected.
In my opinion, humans are above other animals. We are superior. We may rely on them for food and suchlike, but if an animal adversely affects or wellbeing and prosperity, I say kill them. And it's not as if they are extinct; hunts only kill a few foxes and therefore are in no way harming the overall population. The factor that is harming the foxes is destruction of habitat involved in building cities from whence anti-hunt morons come from.
And what of 'hunting for fun'? Why not? Foxes have no 'contract' that says they cannot be killed for entertainment. Where do you think the phrase 'thrill of the hunt' came from?
I know my opinions are extreme, but it's my opinion so why can't it be? Oh, by the way I'm working class, and I'm not a toff; I actually don't like the company of toffs (as I define them).