I don't think you properly understood my comment, maybe I was too brief.
What is crucial is the mindset behind the words. The label that is applied is just that, a label, and yes, the label is not important. The "feeling" and process of how your mind operates is what is important. I believe the exchange above in the quote I included shows that the label applied to the mental operation is of basically no importance, while the operation itself is what is important.
You can't say that there is a difference between "expectation" and "attention" without first painstakingly defining the mental mindset behind them, and as TheCusp showed, if the mental operation behind one person's label of "expectation" matches the mental operation HE attaches to "focused attention" then they are in fact one and the same thing.
So, yes, "just semantics" means that the label doesn't matter, it's what BEHIND the label that matters.
edit: and let me add that yes, terms ("semantics") *are* important, for without them holding a conversation is all but impossible. But that's very difficult, isn't it, for strictly personal internal experiences, using terms that are already (over?) used. People can get together and point at a "cat" and agree on this term for the thing (dare I say, archetypal schema? ) called "cat", but how do we get beyond this hurdle for dreaming experiences? It's al but impossible to even be able to agree on a vocabulary that matches a mode of mental operation.
So the discussion shouldn't run "no you're wrong, expectation is crap, etc.", it should go: "Just what exactly do you mean by "expectation"?") (which, by the way, I do wish someone would go to the effort of defining the mental models behind just what this term means to them).
|
|
Bookmarks