the problem with asking other people as to whether you should believe that your dream has soom deeper meaning (ie above and beyond strictly scientific), is that just as it is with all beliefs that cannot necessarily be proven, in the end you must decide whether or not you believe that this dream was precognitive in nature (as well as your sister-in-law's)...
this is not to say that we wont help you reach some sort of conclusion, or that we strictly remain in the scientific realm (as thats hardly the case), but rather, that ultimately, you are the one who must make this decision
...O'nus, perhaps the fact that she was told about the dream her sister-in-law had, when her subconcious had 'noticed' the large number of cancerous cells, it created a precog sort of senario, as the sub-con can detect these sort of ailments in ourselves long before any sort of medical practices can, and our sub-con is what produces our dreams, no? perhaps a bit far-fetched...i know you're more qualified than i am...what do you think?
|
|
Bookmarks