• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 26 to 50 of 61
    Like Tree34Likes

    Thread: New study rules US an Oligarchy rather than a Democracy

    1. #26
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4140
      DJ Entries
      11
      To win.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    2. #27
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by Original Poster View Post
      To win.
      Which involves getting the most votes. Therefore, the purpose of a campaign is to get the most votes. Politicians care about votes.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    3. #28
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4140
      DJ Entries
      11
      Why are we talking in circles? Getting votes depends only on providing lip service to public opinion, not on your voting record. Even if people cared about your voting record, you wouldn't be a candidate at all if your voting record reflected what people actually wanted. How many fucking times are you going to make me say it?
      Darkmatters likes this.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    4. #29
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      UM, it might be helpful to think of it like the board of directors of a large corporation. The board needs to elect a new CEO, so they go ahead and select two candidates that best serve the interests of the board. Then they put a vote to the shareholders, each one telling them whatever nonsense they think will make them cast their vote for them. But in the end, one of the two guys was going to be CEO.
      Darkmatters likes this.

    5. #30
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by Original Poster View Post
      Why are we talking in circles? Getting votes depends only on providing lip service to public opinion, not on your voting record. Even if people cared about your voting record, you wouldn't be a candidate at all if your voting record reflected what people actually wanted. How many fucking times are you going to make me say it?
      Then votes matter to politicians. Stop playing dodgeball.

      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      UM, it might be helpful to think of it like the board of directors of a large corporation. The board needs to elect a new CEO, so they go ahead and select two candidates that best serve the interests of the board. Then they put a vote to the shareholders, each one telling them whatever nonsense they think will make them cast their vote for them. But in the end, one of the two guys was going to be CEO.
      Let's say that's how it works. Don't votes matter to the candidates once they are at the point of election?
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    6. #31
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      Then votes matter to politicians. Stop playing dodgeball.



      Let's say that's how it works. Don't votes matter to the candidates once they are at the point of election?
      Votes matter to the extent that they want to get elected, but once they're elected they don't give two shits about the voters. And your response will be that the voters will vote them out next election. Except that can never happen, because the candidates will always be chosen beforehand to suit the interests of the ruling class.
      Darkmatters and StephL like this.

    7. #32
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      Votes matter to the extent that they want to get elected, but once they're elected they don't give two shits about the voters. And your response will be that the voters will vote them out next election. Except that can never happen, because the candidates will always be chosen beforehand to suit the interests of the ruling class.
      How does that prevent politicians from being voted out of office?
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    8. #33
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      How does that prevent politicians from being voted out of office?
      Any given politician can be voted out, but the selection of alternatives will always be just as bad. It's like trying to cure acne by popping pimples.
      Darkmatters likes this.

    9. #34
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      Any given politician can be voted out, but the selection of alternatives will always be just as bad. It's like trying to cure acne by popping pimples.
      I agree with that, in terms of candidates that actually have hope of getting elected. What I am getting at in this thread is that the people still have the ultimate power through votes. Politicians obviously care about votes. That is because votes decide who gets into office and who stays in office. Voters are not using their power like they should, but that doesn't mean they don't have power. The people still have the ultimate power. They are just being fools with it.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    10. #35
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      I agree with that, in terms of candidates that actually have hope of getting elected. What I am getting at in this thread is that the people still have the ultimate power through votes. Politicians obviously care about votes. That is because votes decide who gets into office and who stays in office. Voters are not using their power like they should, but that doesn't mean they don't have power. The people still have the ultimate power. They are just being fools with it.
      Nope. If the people somehow got the solidarity to use votes to elect someone fully outside the establishment (which is a statistical impossibility with such a large electorate), the government would simply ignore those votes, rig the election, etc. You simply don't get it. And I doubt you ever will, being as brainwashed as you are.

    11. #36
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      Nope. If the people somehow got the solidarity to use votes to elect someone fully outside the establishment (which is a statistical impossibility with such a large electorate), the government would simply ignore those votes, rig the election, etc. You simply don't get it. And I doubt you ever will, being as brainwashed as you are.
      You just went childish on me again. How old are you? I have illustrated clearly that politicians care a lot about votes. They spend millions of dollars and go on speech marathons that exhaust them to try to get the votes they need. Can you prove that elections would be rigged and votes wouldn't count if a non-establishment person were a candidate? No, you can't. What we do know is that most of the voters get all boned up about the Republocrat candidates, even when they majorly disagree with both of them. That is the problem.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    12. #37
      Member StephL's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2013
      LD Count
      84
      Gender
      Posts
      2,420
      Likes
      3288
      DJ Entries
      117
      The people have the power to throw somebody out of his or her position - see Clinton, who had to leave, because he was too stupid to ensure privacy for his private activities.

      But the people have no power over which more or less competent front-decorations are put up for them to choose from.

    13. #38
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by StephL View Post
      The people have the power to throw somebody out of his or her position - see Clinton, who had to leave, because he was too stupid to ensure privacy for his private activities.
      Which version of history are you talking about? Clinton wasn't forced to leave anything.

    14. #39
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by StephL View Post
      But the people have no power over which more or less competent front-decorations are put up for them to choose from.
      If we would stop voting for the Bozos it comes down to, things would stop coming down to them.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    15. #40
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4140
      DJ Entries
      11
      UM is just a government shill ruining threads like these all over the internet. Think about it, he only gripes about conspiracies that are completely ridiculous and argues the most ridiculous aspects of them, spews nonsensical libertarian propaganda to poison the well, then spams the fuck out of any thread he participates in by derailing the subject.
      BLUELINE976 likes this.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    16. #41
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by Original Poster View Post
      UM is just a government shill ruining threads like these all over the internet. Think about it, he only gripes about conspiracies that are completely ridiculous and argues the most ridiculous aspects of them, spews nonsensical libertarian propaganda to poison the well, then spams the fuck out of any thread he participates in by derailing the subject.
      I'm starting to think the same thing. UM is apparently the world's worst libertarian. I'm pretty sure he's scaring people away from the cause.
      BLUELINE976 likes this.

    17. #42
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Aw, look at the two cry babies who couldn't counter my points. So sad.



      I proved that politicians care about votes and that therefore votes count and the people have the power. Stop whining. Just accept the fact that you were wrong. You got stumped, and you're frustrated. You could at least try to act grown up about it.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    18. #43
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4140
      DJ Entries
      11
      You've generated a hypothetical explanation of how it should work ideally, then ignored the reality of the situation. You've essentially taken reality, substituted it with your own, shown no understanding of the facts in the title of this thread and then wouldn't let go of a basic point. I even followed your loaded questions and when my explanation differed from what your illusionary grip of reality presents you ignored it went back into your circular reasoning. Then continued to flood my thread with spam, typical government shill.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    19. #44
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Ha ha, "shill." That's hilarious. You are such a racist.

      Nothing in your post counters my points about how the U.S. is not an oligarchy. I explained the whole reasoning process from first point to last point, and you are not explaining it away. You are off on tangents and having an outburst.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    20. #45
      Member StephL's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2013
      LD Count
      84
      Gender
      Posts
      2,420
      Likes
      3288
      DJ Entries
      117
      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      Which version of history are you talking about? Clinton wasn't forced to leave anything.
      If I miss out on irony - shame on me - otherwise - I refer to this piece of history:

      Impeachment of Bill Clinton
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. He was acquitted of both charges by the Senate on February 12, 1999.
      Independent Counsel Ken Starr alleged that Clinton had broken the law during his handling of the Lewinsky scandal and the Paula Jones lawsuit. Four charges were considered by the full House of Representatives; only two passed, and those on a nearly party-line vote. It was only the second time in history that the House had impeached the President of the United States, and only the third that the full House had considered such proceedings.
      The trial in the United States Senate began right after the seating of the 106th Congress, in which the Republicans began with 55 Senators. A two-thirds majority (67 Senators) was required to remove Clinton from office. Fifty Senators voted to remove Clinton on the obstruction of justice charge and 45 voted to remove him on the perjury charge; no Democrat voted guilty on either charge.
      How can you even bring yourself in such a stupid situation? *sigh*

    21. #46
      Diamonds And Rust Achievements:
      Veteran First Class Vivid Dream Journal Referrer Bronze Populated Wall Made lots of Friends on DV Tagger First Class 10000 Hall Points
      Darkmatters's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Center of the universe
      Posts
      6,949
      Likes
      5848
      DJ Entries
      172
      It seems basically impossible to remove high ranking officials from office in the US. Isn't Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for refusing to produce the Fast and Furious records? He's still doing his job. Didn't Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton both 'step down' in disgrace after Benghazi? A couple of weeks later they both showed up again as if nothing had happened, with new titles and new appointments. Has stepping down been degraded to a brief suspension, because I thought it was a permanent condition? And it seems it should mean the offender should not be eligible for ANY high-ranking political career, not just the exact same title they held at the time.

      It's Whack-A-Mole - push them down and they just pop up somewhere else fresh as a daisy. And of course, I do realize that wasn't an example of the pubic demanding someone's resignation or voting them out of office, but it does show the dishonesty of this administration and the manipulative tricks they'll use to recycle their friends. If you're in tight with the administration, you're teflon - nothing will stick.
      Last edited by Darkmatters; 04-24-2014 at 04:53 AM.

    22. #47
      Banned
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,590
      Likes
      522
      Quote Originally Posted by StephL View Post
      How can you even bring yourself in such a stupid situation? *sigh*
      Maybe you're too young to remember what happened, or you're just really dumb, I'm not sure. But Bill Clinton was never forced out of office. He was impeached, which just meant he had to answer some questions from Congress. He served his complete term right to January of 2001.

    23. #48
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4140
      DJ Entries
      11
      Dance puppets dance!

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    24. #49
      Member StephL's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2013
      LD Count
      84
      Gender
      Posts
      2,420
      Likes
      3288
      DJ Entries
      117
      Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
      Maybe you're too young to remember what happened, or you're just really dumb, I'm not sure. But Bill Clinton was never forced out of office. He was impeached, which just meant he had to answer some questions from Congress. He served his complete term right to January of 2001.
      That would be - I'm just really dumb, thank you very much.
      Funnily enough, I was in the USA, when the news about the Lewinski affair broke, and I must have forgotten this not exactly minor detail.
      Nor did I read Wikipedia properly.
      What kept sticking in my mind back then, was - what a shame he ruined his political career with that.
      Which he did - even if he served on for a year - questionable, not because of the oval activity, but because of trying to manipulate investigations.

      Seems this old sentiment (damn - it's going to be the Republicans next, and for such a silly bullshit!) has put the blinds on my thinking.
      Fantastic of you to have taken the time to educate me!

    25. #50
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Bill Clinton was impeached, but it is common for people to think impeachment has to involve removal from office. That has a lot to do with the fact that Nixon resigned when impeachment hearings were on the horizon. If Nixon had stuck around for the impeachment hearings, he would have been removed from office. That had a lot of people thinking that Nixon was impeached and that impeachment is removal from office. The scenario was misunderstood, and the misunderstanding was mass communicated and still remains today. Most people who weren't alive in the 70's aren't clear on what happened or on what impeachment is. Impeachment is just Congressional accusation and assessment of and possibly discipline for corruption while in public office.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Is the EU attempting to circumvent democracy?
      By Original Poster in forum Extended Discussion
      Replies: 73
      Last Post: 11-27-2011, 12:53 AM
    2. Is The US A Democracy Or A Republic?
      By DeeryTheDeer in forum Philosophy
      Replies: 22
      Last Post: 11-11-2010, 06:51 AM
    3. Welcome to the War on Democracy
      By MementoMori in forum Extended Discussion
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: 01-25-2010, 06:12 AM
    4. The illusion of democracy.
      By dreamboat in forum General Lucid Discussion
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: 06-02-2005, 12:08 AM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •