Thread: *giggle*

hmmm,

naked guys...alright, if you promise to look at Playboy later, i'll still love you!

sure your looking at it for reference, i bet your...nevermind

ROFL. Actually, I use Playgirl/Playboy, Maxim, and Stuff magazines for reference when I draw figures. They really do make great reference pictures. Um... and the articles rule. Or something...

Originally posted by A Lost Soul
I'm reading a Playgirl right now. *

I\'m looking for reference pictures for my drawings... honest!

suuuuuuuuure....we believe you....no really, we do...

you just buy it for the articles, right???

Hell no. I buy it for the naked bodies.
Seriously, though, Maxim and Stuff are friggin hilarious. They're pretty tasteful, too, so far as mostly naked women are concerned. Maxim and Stuff have been great references and inspirations to my art.

I'm not too keen on this Playgirl, though. I mean, the guys are hot and all, but geez... their wangs are about this big:
(==) (Actual size... )
I mean, come on. Men get to ogle over big boobs, dammit. Women want to ogle big packages too!

although it\'s not the size that matters... it\'s what you do with it...

actual size LMFAO.

I thought you worked in a photolab.
Any pictures of big dong's every pass by....

LOL

Who'd ever thought porn magazines could be this useful

Speaking of porno...has anyone ever seen the movie 8 MM (EIGHT MILLIMETER) with Nicholas Cage=

that movie scared me not in a horror film way, but it was sick.

but yeah, anyway...that whole size thing, sad to say it is BOTH the 'motion in the ocean' and the size. cause well size does matter to some extent

I've never seen 8mm, I heard it was scary though. That's cool lost soul, everyone likes a bit of adult literature every now and then. My favourite magazines are ones like RALPH and FHM(They are Australian mens magazines not pornos). They tell you cool things like how to throw a knife like a pro and where to buy a set of testicles for your performance veichle, you know, nothing but manly stuff. The scantily clad, tastefully photographed women are a welcome and integral part of these books.

They could very well be used for reference, good idea. But how could anybody make a magazine full of nothing but naked men with tiny willies? Even if I was a woman that isn't a very tempting prospect.

although it's not the size that matters... it's what you do with it...[/b]

That's a bloody lie, size does matter. It determines pecking order.

lol, you hafta to know how to draw a body naked, before you can know how to draw a naked body with clothes on it

FHM is pretty cool. I have a few of those, too. I had to get the Buffy spectacular.

Originally posted by Seeker
I thought you worked in a photolab.
Any pictures of big dong's every pass by....

Actually no. I have yet to see any:
a. hot guys (with the exception of rare pictures from bachlorette parties. Meow!)
b. nicely-endowed guys (with the exception of rare pictures from bachlorette parties... can I have one for my next birthday?)
c. guys that don't look like they've made a meal of ten twinkies and a beer every day for the last twenty years.

My theory is that only the guys with really small packages take pictures of themselves naked. I suspect that it's so they don't forget where their junk is. Or maybe to have documented proof that they actually do have junk? The saddest part is... they're erect. I shed tears for these poor men. Or are they really women? God, I'm so mean. I'll tell you something, though. I think if there ever were a nice picture to come through our fab, the ladies would be passing it around (yes, we do that We're not allowed to keep anything, but nothing stops us from passing stuff around the fab). Even one with nice buns... I mean, come on, throw us a bone!

Speaking of, just tonight I processed pictures from some orgy that a bunch of ugly people had. Good grief... It makes you want to cut them a check with a note enclosed:

"Please buy a polaroid. Thank you." -the employees of Konica

I'm so glad I'm not easily offended. I'd have quit my job a long time ago.

I think it would be a cool job. You're not like the 'One Hour Photo' guy are you

I'd send you a picture, but sadly, not much to see

...i'd send ya a picture, but between the fact that it would cost me a fair amount to buy a camera then send the film across the US, and the fact that im pretty sure that'd be illegal...well the point is, its not gonna happen sry



tho i doubt you\'d want to see me anyway

No, we're nothing like the One-Hour Photo guy. But a lot of that movie is true, like new parents taking BAZILLIONS of rolls of their new kids. Like they won't see enough of them for the next 18 years, right?

And sorry, WeRburN, but that wasn't even funny. I actually caught a child pornographer once, and I've only been working there for a year. I hope I never see shit like that again. Porn is one thing--to each their own, you're consenting adults--but when it involves underage kids (granted teens are having sex all the time, but still...) or animals... that's just fucking sick.

Edit: I just realized it might look like I'm angry with you. I'm not. It's just that those pictures upset me.

Originally posted by Lost Soul
or animals... that's just fucking sick.

yeah, you said it...nasty.
like the movie 8 MM, where the porn involves killing women, ah, fuckers.

What's even nastier is that I've seen it. People actually do that sort of thing.

Oh my god! You actually saw photos of ugly people having an orgy?!? Oh god, trauma! *Runs over and gives sympathy hug*

The saddest part is... they're erect. I shed tears for these poor men. [/b]

I had no idea when you made a comment about the tiny todgered teasers from Playgirl that they actually HAD wood. That makes it that much worse.

when it involves underage kids or animals... that's just fucking sick. *
[/b]

Why are people so weird? I swear, there must be something in the drinking water.

By the way, this may just be my insanity flaring up again, but has anybody had a day where anywhere you go and anything you do, you can see nothing but ugly people?

lol...i read your post LS and i thought you were mad ...and child porn is one thing, but you dont even know how old i am! so maybe it is legal? you dont know

...how old deos everyone think i am anyway? *is curious now* ...su-chan deosnt get to geuss either

...i remember one time, my friend took a picture of his wang...he was 19 at the time, but they wouldnt develop it (tho frankly im glad)...one thing my and my friends often do is we buy a disposable camera, and we try to take pictures that look as horrible as possible...not like disgusting, i mean just...well you prolly understand...its fun lol...oh ya, another time *jus remembered* i broke my hand, and while it was still magled and bleeding i took a picture...when i went to have it developed, the lady said she almost threw up when she saw it lol

I have to say that I've seen far worse than a mangled hand. We also develop pictures for forensics labs all over the country (well, this side of the Mississippi anyway). Of course, being the morbid loser CSI freak that I am, I study them for awhile before moving on.

...i saw a car wreck once (not in a photo)...some guy had crashed his car into the median on the freeway...his family was in the car too...he was alive, but his wife was on the hood of the car dead, and he had a child maybe 2 or 3 years old, that was about 10 feet in front of the car, missing the top 1/3 of his head/skull...most disgusting thing i'd ever scene...very very sad too

Oh my... usually for scenes like that, the police and investigators block everything off.

Yeah... the most disturbing thing I've seen was watching everything live and uncensored on September 11, 2001. The public saw a lot of things that normally aren't shown out of respect. But that was an all around unexpected and chaotic day.