I know where you get this hypothesis from. Scientific Researchers, who are geared only for Quantitative Analysis and are not in the least equiped for Qualitative or Aesthetic Analysis suppose that Dreams are random firings of Nerve Cells. They suppose this because the can count firings of brain cells. They ignore Meaning because they cannot Quantify Meaning.Originally posted by Belisarius
I had the concept of dreams as being a string of unstable, disconnected perception that our minds try to understand by impressing our a priori conceptions upon it. We dream of something entirely senseless, and then turn it into a familiar object. That is why dreams are usually in familiar places, with familiar people. We aren't equipped to make sense of dreams so we use our conceptions from waking hours and try to fit them onto the senseless flow of dream perception.
So then the interpretation of dreams can be thought of as finding out why your mind applies these a priori conceptions to the somewhat random flow of raw dream.
That is how nearsighted and myoptic Science is.
We KNOW Dreams have meaning.
Simply look at the Dreams of our New Japanese Friend in the Dream Interpretation Section and then try to convince us that Dreams are not Coherently Meaningful.
Now, you may have disordered Dreams, but this is because you have not yet established any progress in integrating your waking self into your Dream Self. Your Dreams seem disordered only because your Memory of what had happened was faulty and misfiring. With some experience in Dreaming, your Dreams can become just as Coherent as those of our Japanese Friend and many of our other Dreamers who would never suspect their Dreams of originating in random nerve end discharges.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks