Oh boy, my favorite subject.
Web 2.0 has it's strong points and it's pitfalls. The most important aspect of Web 2.0 is the seperation of content and form. CSS, RSS, and XML as a whole really helps keep everything organized and easy to syndicate, which is important in an internet that relies on machines to organize data. Web 2.0 can work for you if you let it. One thing, though, that really gets on my nerves is the community aspect of Web 2.0. Stories make it through the blog world (or blogosphere for all you buzzword junkies) much like rumors do, which becomes a problem when so many people trust blogs as a reliable news source. One other thing to mention is that when people read a blog, it's much more personal than reading, say, a newspaper column. People connect on a different level to these articles, and this leaves more room for persuasion, manipulation, and sensationalism to create a "movement", so to speak, for a specific cause. For example, remember the battle for Net Neutrality? This is a prime example of bloggers (and digg, oh digg..) creating tremendous hype against a bill that, if put into effect, would really hit home for everybody with internet property. There were dates, dates, in which the internet was supposed to cease being a "neutral network". Well those dates have long gone and nothing has happened yet. Just goes to show you what kind of power the internet has on people - If only they could learn to be more critical when reading articles.
That being said, the basic theory behind Web 2.0 is a very powerful one, and if used correctly, could again revolutionize the very way we use information.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks