Thread: Photos Of Jesus In The Sky!

Interesting, yet I can see why you see it's a bit disturbing.

All the pictures seem to be the same.

And I have no explanation.

I was watching a special on tornados once and they were talking about this one monster tornado out west, think it was an f5, not sure. But anyway, they were interviewing the people that rode out the twister in this church. There was one main hallway that ran down the center of the church, and everybody gathered and tucked in that particular hallway.
The twister demolished the entire building, except for that one, particular hallway. They showed video of the aftermath and it was just a single corridor standing up in the center of a massive pile of debris. To see the church, beforehand, it'd be hard to even imagine how it would stand up against an f3, let alone an f5, as aged as it seemed.
Everyone came out and someone took a picture of the sky over the church.

I figured the picture would be all over the internet, but I googled around for "Jesus"/"tornado" and the only pic I could find of it is on some stupid little post card, but check it out.

http://www.javaforjesus.com/JCphenom.html
Press the "Click Here for Tornado Picture" icon, and then click it again.

The first time I saw it was on a documentary, so the "flashy" lil java app kinda cheapens it, but it's still some cool shit. Heh.

Meh. I wasn't convinced by that image, it looked like a regular cloud to me.

I wonder what would have happened if everyone was killed and someone took a picture of the sky in which a particular cloud looked like jesus.

Originally Posted by Manifold_Time

I wonder what would have happened if everyone was killed and someone took a picture of the sky in which a particular cloud looked like jesus.
[/b]

You know, it is possible to doctor photos

Well, of course some of the photos will be frauds.

The Conyers Georgia photos are fakes. What the hell would Mary be doing appearing to Crackers in Georgia -- they aren't even Catholic! And then the Conyers Georgia people are highly focussed on making an money makeing industry out of their Apparitions. This leads to some fairly natural suspicions and once one asks a few pointed questions, the conspiracies reveal themselves.

Are any of the photos genuine. Well, it is difficult to say. Even if the people who took the photos are honest, we still don't know about the developers. They may think it funny to double expose a jesus or a Mary to see if they can cause a ruckus.

So, no, there is no photo that can be considered a miracle, except by those individuals who have taken the photos themselves and developed them themselves, and in those cases the individuals will have to be satisfied that they have themselves a personal miracle, as nobody else can believe it.

What we can believe are Mass Miracles, or Medical Miracles... something a bit more difficult than a double exposed photo plate.

Give me a picture of a cloud, five minutes, and Jesus/Mary will magically appear on the picture, in a very fady, yet vissible way.

Give me another 5 minutes, and the word "gay" and an arrow, pointing at Jeus, will appear aswell. Not trying to insult anybody, I am just trying to imply how easy, it is to make a picture showcase an important person, in fx. the sky.

The best Miraculous Image we have is not a photograph, but is similar to a photograph.

The Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe that was miraculously created back at about 1520, is not a painting. Scientists have examined the miraculous image and have found that that there are no paints, pigments, brushstrokes, none of that stuff. It seems that the colors have grown chemically out of the very fabric itself, and the detail resolution is like that of photography, if not more absolute. Indeed, they examined the images in the Virgin's eyes -- the reflections in her eyes, and they were able to discern the room she was looking at, with all of the people involved. What painter could have done that, or even have thought to have done that.

Oh, debunkers will say that they have found paint. Yes, the French, when they conquered Mexico for a time, they desicrated the Image by painting little French flor de lis on the Virgins cloak -- as though that would fool anybody. But the underlying Image is a proven miracle.

That is so fake. It is clearly from a film from the 60's.

As I understand, it is human nature to look for order in caos. I can get you tons of picture of clouds with devils, dragons, jesuses, you name it.
That's why : ) is regarded as a happy face I guess, or that's why cars look like they have faces, at least to me .

I bought a waffle on ebay that had burn marks that looked like the weeping virgin mary.

I am saved.

the statue of mary shat blood on my face

Looks more like a Mushroom shape to me I guess it's our Imagination that differs from person to person: Christians will see a cloak of a Jesus-figure in it, Aztecs will see one of their Gods in it..etc

I think it is a natural phenmenon, a natural shape of clouds possibly rising from a very hot heatsource. Nature is Magic enough. No need to look for Supernatural theories here. and of course there's alot of ''story tellers'' out there with funny sites and Photoshop?

Jesus? No actually it's a cloud. a strange cloud for sure...
But let's say that Jesus never was born and the New Testament, the Christian Bible, never was written....What would people THEN have seen in these clouds?

Probably still something Supernatural. The Gods, spirits..etc
We see weird things and make up our own explanations.

But a supersticious Christian would say: I saw jesus last night after I took a dump and looked at my feaces, I saw jesus in the darker pattern on my toast bread, I saw Jesus in the Clouds...etc

A supersticious Aztec would say he saw his RainGod Tlaloc in the Clouds, He saw Tlaloc in a rockformation, he saw Tlaloc in the remains of his Cup of Yerba coffee...etc

Indeed, I also see faces in the headlights and front bumbers of cars: Doesn't mean cars have faces now does it?

There's a long way from Truth to Interpretation.

Originally Posted by Marvo

Give me a picture of a cloud, five minutes, and Jesus/Mary will magically appear on the picture, in a very fady, yet vissible way.

Give me another 5 minutes, and the word "gay" and an arrow, pointing at Jeus, will appear aswell. Not trying to insult anybody, I am just trying to imply how easy, it is to make a picture showcase an important person, in fx. the sky.
[/b]

LOL

Originally Posted by Marvo

As I understand, it is human nature to look for order in caos. I can get you tons of picture of clouds with devils, dragons, jesuses, you name it.
That's why : ) is regarded as a happy face I guess, or that's why cars look like they have faces, at least to me .
[/b]

CARS DO HAVE FACES!

Where's the head. He lost his head! No wonder he feels a bit stormy.

Sorry to spoil your fun guys, but it's been photoshopped or something. They have probably got a picture of clouds, a picture of jesus. Set it to overlay, lowered the opacity and played about.

Sorry

And jesus, if that is you. I'm extra sorry

those photos could have easily been faked...

I agree about the photoshop. It looks like the same image, just doctored up in a bunch of different ways. You guys have an idea how seriously EASY it would be to do that? I could whip up a Jesus or Mary image miracle in less than five minutes and have you all believers.

i wouldnt believe you

perks of atheism.



we (atheists) arent as easily fooled by such "moving" images.

Yeah, it is so easy to photoshop this stuff.

Either that or I just found the God of teddy bears:


It's either photoshopped or a coincidence. If Jesus was to make an appearance on Earth, why would it be so descretely? What is to gain from making an appearance like that, it's not like he'd be doing anyone any good, is it?

LAWL

That teddy bear god rules...I smell a new religion?