Thread: Ask me nothing and I will tell you no lies.

Ok... Nothing? Now don't lie about it.

Also, what is the truth?

Whats in my pocket?

What is hte weather like here where I'm at right now?

Haha I'm just trying smiles out.

[quote=taltho;420932]Ok... Nothing? Now don't lie about it.
I cannot lie about the absence of anything.

Also, what is the truth?
There is only one real truth. But hundred of thousands of truths that are a delusion, a belief. The truth to me may be hog wash to you?


Whats in my pocket?
fabric


What is hte weather like here where I'm at right now?
Haha I'm just trying smiles out.

Like everywhere else. Consisting of humidity, barometric pressure, temperature, air disturbance and a dew point.

Ask you nothing. That's easy and leaves lots of options.

None of which I will exercise.

Shalom, my friend.

Originally Posted by pj

Ask you nothing. That's easy and leaves lots of options.

None of which I will exercise.

Shalom, my friend.

After the first response, I realized the many implications.
Now I hope it gets lost in the depth of forgotten posts!
peace.
:p

What came first the chicken or the egg?

Hi Howie,

Upswitch pizzazle dooklay nought? Egregiam dit ik and nigglenam? Seriously.

Originally Posted by folded

Hi Howie,

Upswitch pizzazle dooklay nought? Egregiam dit ik and nigglenam? Seriously.

Hi Folded

No.

What came first the chicken or the egg?

The egg.

Originally Posted by Howie

The egg.

Prove it.


So how's your weather? Going to have a nice weekend?

Originally Posted by Howie

The egg.

I agree.

Originally Posted by Burns

Prove it.

"Proof" is a lot to ask for but, if Howie doesn't, I can explain why the egg came first.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

I can explain why the egg came first.

Ok I actually agree and that the egg came first, but I would love to hear an explanation why you think so.

Originally Posted by Burns

Ok I actually agree and that the egg came first, but I would love to hear an explanation why you think so.

Ok. (sorry Howie, you were a bit too late on the draw, so I'm stepping on your toes. Hehe.)

The very first creature born, that could be called a "chicken" has to have had two parents that were (while, possibly, of similar species) not called "chickens." It would be the mixing of these two creatures' traits, in the form of an offspring, that create what we now call "a chicken," and this new creature would not exist, before the egg.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

The very first creature born, that could be called a "chicken" has to have had two parents that were (while, possibly, of similar species) not called "chickens." It would be the mixing of these two creatures' traits, in the form of an offspring, that create what we now call "a chicken," and this new creature would not exist, before the egg.

Nice

Originally Posted by Burns

Nice

Hehe. I try.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

Ok. (sorry Howie, you were a bit too late on the draw, so I'm stepping on your toes. Hehe.)

The very first creature born, that could be called a "chicken" has to have had two parents that were (while, possibly, of similar species) not called "chickens." It would be the mixing of these two creatures' traits, in the form of an offspring, that create what we now call "a chicken," and this new creature would not exist, before the egg.

I sort of agree with that, but it is also a paradox. How did two different species create offspring? I think it was a slow process that happened over a long period of time. And then where does the egg come from? what species developed the egg before it existed in the first place?


Howie, what is a paradox in time?

Originally Posted by taltho

I sort of agree with that, but it is also a paradox. How did two different species create offspring? I think it was a slow process that happened over a long period of time. And then where does the egg come from? what species developed the egg before it existed in the first place?

The parents would be of the same species, but "ancestors" of the chicken. They would also have to have already been egg-laying creatures.

slimey, oozing gunk that makes more of itself, like algae, came before both chickens and eggs. Gunk begat chickens, plants and people.

The gunk itself is made from stardust, thrown off of supernovas that happened aeons before.

Therefore, we are all stargunk.

How's that for chop-logic?

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

Ok. (sorry Howie, you were a bit too late on the draw, so I'm stepping on your toes. Hehe.)

The very first creature born, that could be called a "chicken" has to have had two parents that were (while, possibly, of similar species) not called "chickens." It would be the mixing of these two creatures' traits, in the form of an offspring, that create what we now call "a chicken," and this new creature would not exist, before the egg.

Sounds good to me!

So it is fair to say that fried eggs and ham were around before wings and beer?

The chicken came first.

The concept of species as hard and fast divisions in nature is an artificial construct for convenient categorization. There is a spectrum of chicken-ness, and where you draw the line is arbitrary. Therefore the question is not valid.

Well I believe O, as animals evolve they get slightly different, for example an animal might give birth to a slightly different animal which over a period of years give birth to the chicken we all know and love.

Think of how men were supposed to have evolved from apes, at first we would have loads of fur and climb trees, then we learnt to stand on 2 legs and then slowly gave birth to new species to become what we are today.

Personally, Howetzer, I want to ask what on Earth "Jation" means.

Originally Posted by Demerzel

Personally, Howetzer, I want to ask what on Earth "Jation" means.

In short:
I have a book of ideas and inventions. My birth name is Jason. Some spell it jayson some say Jay, others J and so on.
To attribute to my collection, I one day thought of Jation. Jation the ©reation.
That is my Allies.