LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteWow, nice photo
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Chemical Bonds Photo
- 08-28-2009 08:27 AM #1Fireworks and Hurricanes Achievements:
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cambridge
- Posts
- 8,472
- Likes
- 1695
Chemical Bonds Photo
After spending years being told by my teacher not to try and look at diagrams of chemical bonds as actual things but more just simplifications and symbols, this article is something of a shocker. It's amazing actually.
Here is roughly how we would draw the molecule in the article:
We tend to miss them out but we could also show the bonds to the hydrogen atoms around the outside of the molecule.
Here's the article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8225491.stm
soft she stirs on starlit sand,
and clasps wet shore within her hand.
she turns to face the silent seas,
and through her heart, a vital breeze.
she wonders at this strange new land.
- 08-28-2009 08:57 AM #2Member Achievements:
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- LD Count
- 150
- Gender
- Location
- Copenhagen, Denmark
- Posts
- 843
- Likes
- 18
The wise ones fashioned speech with their thought, sifting it as grain is sifted through a sieve. ~ Buddha
- 08-28-2009 10:16 AM #3Smarter than a chimpanzee Achievements:
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
- Location
- Not too high, not too low
- Posts
- 2,168
- Likes
- 439
I'm not a chemistry person but I find that in math at least, lower level (i.e. not Phds) teachers don't know what the fuck they're talking about. That's just a general rule of with exceptions of course but, in the states at least, it's fearfully accurate.
Post-Rapture Pet-Sitting Services
Come join the Buddhism Stack.
"The opposite of a true statement is false statement, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth. "
-Niels Bohr
- 08-28-2009 10:41 AM #4Fireworks and Hurricanes Achievements:
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cambridge
- Posts
- 8,472
- Likes
- 1695
Chemists are just the surface, if you've ever heard a biologist try to talk maths...
Once we had to work out the respiratory quotient (I can't believe I still remember all this rubbish) of some organism or other, and we ended up having to divide 0 by 0... my teacher asked the class and there were some mumbles of '0' which she took to be correct... naturally I took issue with this flagrant mathematical rape and she just got annoyed and ignored me...
Gah biologists.
soft she stirs on starlit sand,
and clasps wet shore within her hand.
she turns to face the silent seas,
and through her heart, a vital breeze.
she wonders at this strange new land.
- 08-28-2009 10:46 AM #5Tech Admin
Achievements:
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Gender
- Location
- Sunny Scotland
- Posts
- 4,789
- Likes
- 750
- DJ Entries
- 17
wow thats amazing.
and lol xei
- 08-28-2009 11:01 AM #6Dismember Achievements:
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Gender
- Location
- The river
- Posts
- 243
- Likes
- 37
Your teacher might have been talking about the double bonds in the aromatic ring. They don't correspond to the physical reality. In reality the double bond (or electrons involved in it) is delocalized or spread over the entire ring, making it something between the single and double bond (as far as energy goes).
About your biology comment: I'm a bio(chem) person trying to cross into the mathematical realm. While I'm not an expert in mathematics, I don't consider myself mathematically illiterate. Bad teachers are just bad teachers, no generalization should be made about the entire field just because of them.
Some of my statistics and math. modelling teachers would occasionally say things that make no sense biologically or evolutionary.
However, I do agree that people should get better basic education in mathematics if they are to be involved in any field of science... or if they are to educate generations of future scientists.
- 08-28-2009 11:21 AM #7Smarter than a chimpanzee Achievements:
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
- Location
- Not too high, not too low
- Posts
- 2,168
- Likes
- 439
That's never a good sign
Originally Posted by Xei 
I once had a math teacher claim that you could multiply the first n primes and then subtract one or add one to the product to get another prime. Always. I thing the first counter example is doing it up to seven but it might be 11 or 13.
Don't be too harsh. The ones that are good at math (the evolutionary biologists) do some interesting stuff. And they did give us natural selection. I have to agree with dennett that that is the greatest idea that anybody ever had. Originally Posted by Xei Post-Rapture Pet-Sitting Services
Come join the Buddhism Stack.
"The opposite of a true statement is false statement, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth. "
-Niels Bohr
- 08-28-2009 11:39 AM #8Fireworks and Hurricanes Achievements:
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cambridge
- Posts
- 8,472
- Likes
- 1695
I remember it being surprisingly large...I once had a math teacher claim that you could multiply the first n primes and then subtract one or add one to the product to get another prime. Always. I thing the first counter example is doing it up to seven but it might be 11 or 13.
I always think that proof's slightly over-complex. I don't see why you don't just take a random set of primes conjectured to be exhaustive.
Oh yeah, we learnt all about that. It's just that there's not really any physical 'bond' there, it's just a fuzzy cloud of electrons, you get it into your head that it's more a conceptual idealisation than anything else.Your teacher might have been talking about the double bonds in the aromatic ring. They don't correspond to the physical reality. In reality the double bond (or electrons involved in it) is delocalized or spread over the entire ring, making it something between the single and double bond (as far as energy goes).
Yeah well, I mean, they're not all bad... my DoS at Cambridge is a mathematical biologist, and I want to do mathematical neuroscience after my BA in maths, so...
About your biology comment: I'm a bio(chem) person trying to cross into the mathematical realm. While I'm not an expert in mathematics, I don't consider myself mathematically illiterate. Bad teachers are just bad teachers, no generalization should be made about the entire field just because of them.
Some of my statistics and math. modelling teachers would occasionally say things that make no sense biologically or evolutionary.
However, I do agree that people should get better basic education in mathematics if they are to be involved in any field of science... or if they are to educate generations of future scientists.
soft she stirs on starlit sand,
and clasps wet shore within her hand.
she turns to face the silent seas,
and through her heart, a vital breeze.
she wonders at this strange new land.
- 08-30-2009 07:45 AM #9DreamSlinger Achievements:
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario
- Posts
- 4,654
- Likes
- 263
- DJ Entries
- 96
The actual image it's self is like looking at one of those optical illusions. It keeps changing and shifting as you look at it. It's like the uncertainty principle at work.
"A dream that we dream alone is just a dream. A dream that we dream together could become reality" - Deepak Chopra
- 09-01-2009 04:37 PM #10Level 5
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- LD Count
- idk :\
- Gender
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 806
- Likes
- 14
- DJ Entries
- 5
Woah, he's right.
cooooool
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have decided that I don't like Sigpics. >.>
WakataDreamer's Dreamworld - My DJ
^^^ (VERY VERY EXTREMELY OUTDATED ... needs to be updated... I'll probably just start a new one when I get some free time to sit down and type)
Project Pandora (you know you're curious)
~ I'll give this some attention, maybe get it going again some time in the future
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks