• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
    Results 76 to 80 of 80
    Like Tree1Likes

    Thread: if time travel were possible...

    1. #76
      adversary RedfishBluefish's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Now
      Posts
      495
      Likes
      4
      WRT paradoxes... my hypotheses are:

      1.
      Quantum mechanics. The unobserved universe/timeline is a superposition of all possible universes, none is more true than the others. When you send the bombs back to kill yourself, you have already observed that you are alive, and were not in fact killed by the bombs. This caused the universe to collapse into a state where all the possible timelines, in which the attempt on your life succeeds, are ruled out. I don't know if I explained that very well at all .

      2.
      Another hypothesis (my own, I've never seen it anywhere else yet). There is space-time, which is really like a big 4d block of space that sits there, with our subjective viewpoints moving forward through it. There is also "meta-time" which allows us to move in time. Meta-time is not a dimension, there is no meta-past or meta-future that exists anywhere.

      What happens is space-time is like a cellular automaton (but of course not cellular since there aren't any cells ) which runs according to some rules which we do not know about. It is "meta-time" which allows the automaton to run. As in any other cellular automaton, there are stable states (like four squares in Conway's) which in our universe, actually dominate and spread (cause adjacent cells to become stable). Since they are stable they are logically consistent (no paradoxes), and it is these stable states which give us our apparently unbreakable laws of physics.

      When you try to kill yourself in the past, you alter the geometry/topology of space-time (by making a bridge to the past), and to a degree, alter the rules of the machine around the changed geometry. Maybe there are no stable states possible in this geometry and you do cause a paradox, and it does switch between each scenario ad infinitum. However this doesn't happen instantly - the automaton takes time to propogate your effects, sort of like waves in spacetime . In another case, there might be a stable state possible, but there is no guarantee it will be anything like the current state of space-time. Maybe the gun jams as the way the automaton resolves itself, or maybe you just erased the Milky Way from the whole of history .

      Well, this is getting long, so /end.

    2. #77
      Rational Spiritualist DrunkenArse's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Da Aina
      Posts
      2,941
      Likes
      1092
      Quote Originally Posted by RedfishBluefish View Post
      WRT paradoxes... my hypotheses are:

      1.
      Quantum mechanics. The unobserved universe/timeline is a superposition of all possible universes, none is more true than the others. When you send the bombs back to kill yourself, you have already observed that you are alive, and were not in fact killed by the bombs. This caused the universe to collapse into a state where all the possible timelines, in which the attempt on your life succeeds, are ruled out. I don't know if I explained that very well at all .
      This is still the same argument, you're just dressing it up with quantum super-position. The question is, if I send the bombs back in time to before I had them or even started acquiring them, where do they go? Just their appearance would be sufficient to change the past and hence the future. So any time travel at all, in the universe that you are describing, still creates paradox.

      If you want to dance around it with quantum physics, you have to go to the full multiple worlds interpretation where all the states continue to exist even after a measurement and some as of yet unspecified mechanism prevents us from ever seeing more than one of them.


      Quote Originally Posted by RedfishBluefish View Post
      2.
      Another hypothesis (my own, I've never seen it anywhere else yet). There is space-time, which is really like a big 4d block of space that sits there, with our subjective viewpoints moving forward through it. There is also "meta-time" which allows us to move in time. Meta-time is not a dimension, there is no meta-past or meta-future that exists anywhere.

      What happens is space-time is like a cellular automaton (but of course not cellular since there aren't any cells ) which runs according to some rules which we do not know about. It is "meta-time" which allows the automaton to run.
      Your notion of meta-time sounds a lot like McTaggert's A-Series. Also, the notion of quantized spacetime (i.e. cellular automaton) is all the rage in non-string theoretic attempts to find a theory of quantum gravity. It might even end up coming out of string theory. I don't know the math of string theory though. Quantized spacetime does seem highly intuitive though. A lot of very smart people seem to be coming to it and it seems like it can be related to the holographic principle and entopy but nobody has figured out how to do it yet.

      I have to run at the moment, but I'll read the rest of your post later. Good stuff.
      Previously PhilosopherStoned

    3. #78
      This is my title. Licity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      632
      Likes
      2
      Quote Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned View Post
      This is still the same argument, you're just dressing it up with quantum super-position. The question is, if I send the bombs back in time to before I had them or even started acquiring them, where do they go? Just their appearance would be sufficient to change the past and hence the future.
      The most elegant solution would be that the person that finds them later sells them to you.
      198.726% of people will not realize that this percentage is impossible given what we are measuring. If you enjoy eating Monterey Jack cheese, put this in your sig and add 3^4i to the percentage listed.

    4. #79
      Rational Spiritualist DrunkenArse's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Da Aina
      Posts
      2,941
      Likes
      1092
      Quote Originally Posted by Licity View Post
      The most elegant solution would be that the person that finds them later sells them to you.
      Your missing the point. I'm sending them back in time to my precise location at the time. I'm the one that finds them. But I send them back in time to a point where I didn't find them. So there must be a paradox or the time machine must not work.
      Previously PhilosopherStoned

    5. #80
      adversary RedfishBluefish's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Now
      Posts
      495
      Likes
      4
      Quote Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned View Post
      This is still the same argument, you're just dressing it up with quantum super-position. The question is, if I send the bombs back in time to before I had them or even started acquiring them, where do they go? Just their appearance would be sufficient to change the past and hence the future. So any time travel at all, in the universe that you are describing, still creates paradox.
      If sending the bombs back at all is a paradox then you cannot send the bombs back. By knowing and having observed the past the waveform of the particles in your brain will have collapsed into a state where whatever superpositions are even there are only of those states that do not cause you to decide to kill yourself. It would work by exactly the same mechanism whereby an electron collapses into one of the possible spin states, because that all the others contradict the observations of your equipment, and are therefore eliminated.

      What it might come down to is that by this interpretation time travel becomes impossible, because all time-travel causes paradoxes which eliminate themselves from the universe.

      Heh, it seems like the more we learn/think about time travel, the more it looks like something impossible, or something we wouldn't want to do even if it was possible. Under many-worlds, there's the "philosophical problem" that the people people in your new universe are not the people in your own - and of course, there's no way you could go back. Under "paradoxes can't exist" it's looking like that would make useful time-travel impossible anyway. And under "meta-time" there's an unknown chance that you will destroy the earth or the galaxy by accident, or even create an expanding sphere of pure chaos pretty much ending the laws of physics as we know them.

    Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •