Originally Posted by Whiskee
Trolling? Please don't pull the "oh you don't want to understand" card, this is a serious yet very simple question.
What exactly did in anyone's experience lead him/her to believe in the astral plane?
OK. For myself, I had a long string of accurate premonitions in dreams over a couple of years, almost nightly at the peak of this. Most often these would preceed the actual event by a few hours. A couple of the most notable ones I wrote down and e-mailed to other people before the event, to prove that I wasn't somehow changing my memory retroactively. Some of the events also decisively eliminated the possibility that I was making the predictions by extrapolating from subtle physical cues, or that I was predicting things that I could cause to happen or which were likely to happen if I looked for them. The same sense that enabled the premonitions was subtly present in my waking life also. To cap it off, I had several experiences with discontinuous jumps in waking reality, where something changed as if it had always been some other way, yet other facts remained consistent with it being the first way. In other words, the causal flow of events that we regard as our world or 'universe' doesn't have to be a unified whole, it can branch and rejoin in ways that produce apparent contradictions. This is neither predicted nor prohibited by modern physics theory, though it goes against both our usual assumptions and our usual experience, fortunately. I chose to accept those events at face value rather than doubting them and being faced with an escalating series of more decisive examples, as happened with the dream premonitions.
None of that tells me anything about an 'astral plane' of course, it just tells me that there's more to reality than current scientific models and explanations can even begin to account for. Since I did not experience anything like an 'astral plane', I questioned the existence of such, and to some extent continue to question it. Conventionally, physical events are supposedly manifest from the 'astral', and you can see them there before they happened. Astral matter is supposedly 'finer' matter which interacts only very subtly with the matter that our senses commonly work in. But it seemed possible to me that this 'astral' matter is invented to explain things like premonitions, and that actually everything can be explained in terms of 'physical' worlds, and some currently unknown interactions between those worlds. The current trend among scientists is to assume that there are other worlds infinitesmally similar to ours, even though there is no known interaction between those worlds. It seemed more plausible to me that I was sensing other worlds similar to ours, in a state a few hours more advanced, than I was sensing 'astrally' or our 'future'.
Now for a variety of reasons I'm coming around a little more now to the idea that there is something like 'astral' matter, even though that metaphor is no doubt flawed. One reason is experiences I've had with astral projection, which I had previously dismissed as unreal based on an absence of other kinds of objective evidence. My experiences did not seem to be merely a particularly vivid type of lucid dream, there was a quality to them that was quite different. I experienced something that was different, which for lack of a better term I'll call my astral body. I'll call it something else if someone provides a better description. This astral body is not what people call the 'dream body' - I agree with people who make a distinction between the two. The dream body sort of floats in ones imagination. The astral body is meshed closely with the physical body, and separating them is to me a very strange experience. I don't have even the beginning of an explanation of what either of these are, I just have the experience. But the "its all in your mind and unreal in other regards" explanations are for me completely implausible now, because of my other experiences which such explanations fail for.
I have not had experiences with shared dreams, but I have had convincing experiences where I have had part of a thought or dream and someone else has had another part of it, that fit together in a very specific way like lock and key. And these experiences occurred in situations that ruled out other possible explanations, such as both dreams being triggered by related prior events. This proves to me at least that our minds are in some sense shared. Beyond that I don't see the point in shared dreaming though, since we already have a shared world which works pretty well if we make the most of it.
So I've typed this big long post, taking up lots of time, and of course I've left out a ton of information to even to make it this short. Does anybody reading it really care that much? This is not the first time I've gone down this path, and not the first time on this site. Sometimes the other person ridicules what I said, as if for some reason another person can't experience something that's different from what they have experienced. More often they just blow it off and go on to argue with a weaker target who's opinions are more book-based, less developed logically, or less scientifically informed. So if you think that the "oh you don't want to understand" card is BS, that's fair enough. Prove it by engaging it in a serious and sincere way.
I understand of course that it would be unreasonable for you to believe that something is real based on what I say, if you haven't experienced it yourself, given that so many other people just make stuff up. But you don't have to make a judgment like that, you can just accept that another person has said something about an experience which you can at present neither confirm or deny, and leave it at that. Of course that's not the same as blowing off that data point as if it doesn't exist.
There's another angle to this also, which I alluded to in my previous post. As an example to illustrate, on another thread recently a couple of people were talking about doing neurofeedback on themselves. I suggested they might want to be cautious, since I have some knowledge in that field, and it can be dangerous if you aren't careful about what you're doing. They mocked me for suggesting that it was any more risky than reading or any other sensory input. OK, whatever - most likely they'll just lose interest and move on to something else, or if they don't they'll either learn quickly or hurt themselves. Its natural selection in action. But that kind of dismissive arrogance has a price, and I see a lot of it on this site. Its the same attitude that has lead a lot of young, smart people I've known to fry themselves with drugs so that they're impaired for the rest of their lives. Why do I want to try to convince people that 'astral matter' is real? What are they going to do with that knowledge if I convince them? Astral stuff can get a little bit dangerous if you're not conscientious about it, just like driving a car, eating unknown plants that you come across in the woods, or most any other activity. And the "why do you want to know?" question does significantly qualify the kinds of experiences you have.
|
|
Bookmarks