philosophical comment about understanding dream phenomena
A few years ago I argued that the experiences we have in dreams and otherwise are strongly limited by the ideas that we have to describe such experiences. Since dreams are partially subjective, the exotic dreams we have would be quite a bit different if we had a richer set of ideas to work with. I felt limited by the available ideas, which are mostly a mash of 100 year old New Age ideas that didn't even make much sense 100 years ago. So I endeavored to correct the identifiable problems in those ideas, and replace them with better ones.
Subsequently, I became more aware of another related problem, which is the extent to which any system of ideas tends to become a mental cage. If we come up with better ideas, we make the cage bigger and more flexible, but we also make it more difficult to break out of. At the outset, this may not seem like much of a problem. Maybe the word 'cage' is too pejorative, it is more like a mental house. But I've encountered so many people who seem unable or unwilling to venture outside of their 'house', it seems there must be more too it than that.
People often go through remarkable logical contortions to try to justify or excuse any areas where their ideas frameworks appear to break down. Where is this coming from? If they really want their ideas to be Truth, why don't they seek out those failings and delight in finding them, so that they can make their ideas better, more true? Instead, people usually defend their chosen doctrines as if these are life rafts that will sink if they question them.
I think there are multiple things going on here. One is that few if any people recognize the extent to which their thoughts define their experience of the world. We think we're dealing with reality, but are only dealing with a crude mental caricature of it. We're mostly too mentally weak to recognize that, we think our thoughts are reality because we we've lived our whole lives within those walls and can only barely move them. Moreover, recognizing the illusory nature of our mental homes is legitimately something to fear. There are many places we could go instead, and places we are tempted to go, which are self destructive. So we try to shore up what works. And for philosophical types there may be ego involved, or even a kind of power lust. People don't want to give up the appearance of wisdom by admitting they've been wildly wrong their whole lives.
Besides all that, which I've commented on before, there's another part of this which I didn't recognize as clearly. This is the extent to which our systems of thought are unavoidably distorted by our feelings and desires. Of course I saw these kinds of distortions, but I used to think the problem could be resolved by more analysis and more objective honesty. Now I think there's a limit to that, and beyond a certain point there is no short term fix. We' are who we are, and this does not change enough within the span of a single human life for us to be able to balance our perspectives.
Suppose by some miracle one of us did actually recognize how the world really works, in a deep enough way that we can really understand things like telepathy and precognition, at least in general terms. What I'm saying is we'd subtly distort that perspective into something that serves our appetites in a gratifying but destructive way. We wouldn't be able to help ourselves. Just look at every 'ism' in the world. Every one contains some substantial element of truth, but also leaves something out which biases perceptions towards some preferred outcome. And if you discover and highlight the flaw, you usually find that it is intentional, by the dishonest way in which people defend it. If we could create a perfect, true 'ism', I don't think it would be any different. People would twist it according to their natures. In that sense, gaining deeper understanding is like gaining access to more potent drugs.
My point isn't that no progress is possible, that we should just give up. My point is that there's a reason we haven't acheived more. And understanding that helps show the kinds of things that help and the kinds of things that don't. In short, anything that helps build deep emotional, mental, and moral strength helps, and anything that undermines that health for the sake of new ideas or exotic experiences doesn't help. Thinking and exploring is good, but there's no benefit to going through contortions to reach further. That's an argument I've made before, but I hope I've explained it a little better this time.
So to summarize what I think I know, in the context of beyond dreaming:
1. Empathy is real, it is possible to actually mentally touch another person, to actually experience something of being in their shoes.
2. Precognition is real, somehow we're not totally trapped within the flow of time, part of ourselves extends outside of it.
3. These two things are closely related.
4. Neither can at all be accounted for by current scientific theory.
5. And yet, it is possible, under certain conditions, to objectively verify that these things are real.
6. We can't solve the mystery, not yet. But we can keep working on it.
7. There's freedom and hope just in knowing that more is possible than what we know now.