lol!
I don't believe in church, even Jebus says "Thou shall call no man father, call no man rabbi" in Mathew me thinks. so nix that idea tsen.
I want to clairify that "in the heat of the moment it was not metaphor" isn't really right. everything is metaphor. This IS a rhetoric game. To understand what I say, you must know me. Know that I see no difference in science, religion, school, or any institution -- just because I think the world may erupt in a cataclysm on 2012 does not make me a sesationalist or a hatemonger.
We must have both, those who believe and those whom don't, if we are to be prepared and balanced JUST IN CASE something should happen. There is nothing wrong with being PREPARED until someone sticks a "god" or a name to this.
And for all the shit I say Tsen, you have to give me credit that I believe without attribution to idolism. I defend no church. I guard no sacred religion. I merely ask for respect of opinion, which over time you have given me much more of and I appreciate it. But you have to give me credit, I believe in these terrors yet I am not afraid. I do not go running to an institution to justify my beliefes. so I will not reference my wisdom, this is a forum for (add various deity's name here) sake!! I may be paranoid, but I am following my own path, and I will not be disrespected for my "religion." I believe in all religions, I disbelieve all religions; One must take what's comes and move on, i do not dwell, i pupport NO BELIEFE SYSTEM.
I also want to say that you are cofusing me with some old christians who were mean to you Tsen. True, I say that humanity might end. True, I say that technology will be responsible. BUT I NEVER SAID THAT THOSE WHO PURSUE TECHNOLOGY WILL BE DESTROYED!!!! NEVER! I said that sure, a lot of them may be responsible, but that is very, very, very different. Hell, a lot of the "christians" will go to! I may too, I am typing ON A COMPUTER! Just because I say that we must scale back technology for the good of humanity DOES NOT mean that I am some ecological radical whom refute all technology as necromatic sin! I LoVE technology, I hate what it does to the earth. I am sorry Tsen that many christians are warmongering, using the end of the world to push their policies, but I have none to push. I simply said we must change. That's it. Nothing threatening there, just a need to make BETTER TECHNOLOGY.
Dude, if someone came to my door and offered me a giant robot mobile suit, would I turn it down?? HELL NO!!! But just because I except technology, does not mean I have to except destruction and urban sprawl.
We must think smarter, not faster. Quality earth, not quanity of useless industrial shit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tao & Te protect me from facts & fantasy equally.
I believe in none, so know if you respond to me with facts, I will not believe a word. I will only believe honest heart felt testimony. Dreams > Science.
in fact, this will probably cause a new panic already talked about, so i will reiderate.
___________________________________
1=0
this is not true in fundemental mathmatics.
in quatum physics, however, it is probable.
since all these atoms have electron "shells," that are really just possible realities, it must be said that 1can = 1 just as easily as 1=0.
if 1 did not exist, 0 could not
if 0 did not exist, 1 could not
fantasy = fiction
metaphor = fact
this will most likely piss a lot of people off. I am clearly stating that not only do my own statements contradict, so do all of yours, but not only THAT, I am also saying that our arguments do not exist without their opposite. It is not that anything is 'invisible', it is that I honestly believe in my hypocrisy, that I will only find truth if I can first identify the extremes. This is not a "lie" or even "metaphor" at this stage, it is allignment, and balance. To many it makes me a liar. But to me, those who state facts are the only liars. By stating "facts" in my first post, I was challenging the forum, looking for smart people. But if I am made an enemy in my search for wisdom, so be it, I care not. Those whom cannot reconize a challenge and see it as a threat have doomed themselves as victims already...
one cannot separate "fact" and "fiction" simply because each person is different, with a different perception.
I respect that you do not "believe" in what I believe Tsen, but to say it is false or a lie is painful, as I have spent my life coming to my conclusions, just as you have yours.
So when I say something, and you think "oh that's bullshit!" it probably is.
Just because I say something doesn't mean I want to argue if it IS there or NOt. It simply means that because it can be thought of, it deserves conversation.
WE ALREADY KNOW IT IS AND IS NOT. What's the point? Let's talk theory, not fact.
I like how the Mars topic went off, ludicrous to most, yet talked about at least. I would pose that "cities" could me microscopic, as one could call a living coral colony a "city," but I see no proof of a large sentient being living on the surface, at any rate. The point is not the existence of 'life,' it is 'what kind of life?' that we search for.
For me, all god is alive, so the "life on mars" or anywhere else question is purely trivial. All life is life, hehe. I think quantas are alive, so what do i know?
================================================== ==================
Just because a dream doesn't come true in YOUR life is no reason to say that I pervert quatum theory. I think it is quite palpable as there are billions of random bits of consciousness thinking at all times, dreams or thought, and to channel one of those billions and billions seems much more likely then a single being thinking of an exclusive thought, separtae from all time space. The idea that I pervert quatum physics simply because I say that all thoughts and dreams are the same seems egotist and separatist to me, even elitist. Dreams constitue just as much proof as reality. After all, reality is in no way stable or concrete, their anatomic make-up is ALWAYs going in and out of this plain. NOTHING is real. The perception is then reconstructed in the brain by CHEMICALs.
Thus, all dreams are precognitive, it is just that no one has the clairity to know which dream they just saw, from where, and why.^^
I hope that even you, Tsen, will agree that my theory can work if you just assume that there are too many people who are all too stupid to sift out who's dream are what. rofl!
just as neuropeptides change the molecular stuctures of our body through emotional direction, we change the earth with our thoughts and actions.
Since so many have violent thoughts, since war has always been prevailent throughout our history, it seems apparent that we will effect the earth in the same manner and that ... one day... earth will react.
I do not know how. I do not know when. Abrahadabra.... we speak only the fool words of Babylon; desire.
|
|
Bookmarks