From the principles of language itself. Or from your own real life experience with a dream image.
From the principles of language, definition provides class mechanics, or what Plato called the similie in multis. As a definition determines class membership, then you can do the reverse, given a member, go to the class definition. The class definition will give you the idea, and you can determine all members of a class by using the definition for it is a standard.
Example, from scripture, let us say that we talk about the lame, the deaf, the poor, the blind. Each of these are class members, the one being indicated is the one NOT listed. (scripture tests class mechanics, in all ways, even subtraction) The mind. So, you are given several members of a class, and you know which one is being targeted because it is the one of the set not listed. The class indicated in this example are environmental acquisition systems by which we live. This is actually the principles by which metaphor works, or what is called "dark speeches, or dark sentences" in scripture. It is an exercise in the principles of judgment.
True use of metaphor simply works with the natural consequences of definition. Instead of going from a definition to determine class members, we are given class members to determine the definition. Thus those logicians, including Aristotle, who claim that Metaphor is not a principle of logic, err by their stupidity.
Use the definition of the class to determine all class members. Class mechanics.
As it is written that the scripture is sealed to man's understanding, so too are dreams. This is because there is no true understaning of judgment, i.e. language in general, until the mind processes information in accordance with these principles. There is no magic involved, no decoder ring bs, just the simple principles of judgment.
If you are going to claim that man does not know judgment, you prove it by putting it right in his face.
|
|
Bookmarks