Quote:
Indeed as america has only existed for 330ish years, americans don't form a single ethnicity. Instead it's more a mixture of various european ancesteries. As people have lived in britain continuously for 12,000 years there does exist a brithish ethnic group. This is where the terms "civicly british" and "ethnically british" come from. If you own a passport, you are civicly british, however if you are ethnically britsh you are just "british", the fact is that I and the 50 millionish others are more british than any black/asian/non british european will ever be. I would take the exact opposite view of mario92, where he says "Lineage and descent don't matter a lick" I would say having a passport doesn't matter a lick.
300 years isn't long enough but 12,000 is because..?
Quote:
I think a good guidline would be unable to benefit from positive discrimination. When they advertise posts for ethnic minorities only I'm sure they have some standard where you have to be no more than 3/4 British. I think if you can't tell if they appear british then they qualify, as the great man himself once said "You just look, you just know". I think if you are 7/8 british then you qualify. But then again most people are 100% british so they arn't subject to the "where do you draw the line" debate.
To be blunt with you, you should know that I find the fact you'd equate 'half black' to 'half British' as disgusting and disturbing. And that you think my disagreeing with this is 'nitpicking'...