Thread: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theorists cyber stalking victims' and survivors' families

Originally Posted by Alric

I am trying to stick to a few points because you constantly rambling on and on about stuff that is entirely irrelevant.

Oh, like my arguments for why I think the event was a hoax? Yeah, those are so irrelevant. Keep dodging them because you obviously can't counter them.

Originally Posted by Alric

You keep refuting your own arguments, saying that entire classrooms of children don't exist, then claiming that you never said.

I am going to challenge you on this again. When did I ever say that any of the supposed victims of the supposed massacre never existed? Quote me. Madeline was not a supposed victim. The character didn't even go to Sandy Hook. So who are you talking about?

You are either trolling or just squirming because you are aware that you are in checkmate. Sandy Hook is way too much of a Twilight Zone story not to have been a hoax. Your responses show that you agree, perhaps just deep down.

No need to re-quote the same thing 4 times over again...

Originally Posted by anderj101

No need to re-quote the same thing 4 times over again...

Yeah, it's obviously futile.

Alric, checkmate.

For whatever reason, clicking from the main page linked me to where UM kept repeating this

Why is Adam Lanza not mentioned in Nancy Lanza's obituary although Ryan Lanza is?

I was really surprised no one took the most obvious explanation: Obituaries are written by family members in most cases. If my sister, aunt, ex-wife, current wife, or whomever is dead because of her child, who is also dead, I'd rather not include that. It's supposed to be honoring her memory; not making it into a news piece. Most of the time, obituaries exclude cause of death, so mentioning her son would have drawn a lot of attention.

It's a non-detail.

I don't think it should have mentioned the cause of death. Mentioning the son of the deceased when he died after the deceased is the norm. He was her son, and he was alive when she died, in the fiction story. The fact that a family member most likely would have written it if the story were true makes it even stranger that Adam was not mentioned. They can't mention that their family member just died? Who wrote Adam's obituary?

That is just part of a bigger picture that is part of an even bigger picture. Adam Lanza is a mysterious character for many reasons. Neighbors never saw him, family members had not seen him since he was a child, he is not pictured in his high school annual, there is indication from a community college that he was enrolled there when he was supposedly in the tenth grade, his brother was arrested in another city although Adam was supposedly found dead at the school, the car he supposedly drove to the school belonged to some guy who had nothing to do with the Lanzas, the driver's license supposedly found on him was Ryan's, there were contradictory police accounts of how he got into the school, he would have been the best massacre marksman in history, there is no video or photograph of him at the school although the school had a video surveillance system (think of convenience stores), the loudness of the 154 in door AR-15 shots would have thrown off his inner ear so much he would not have been able to stand, he had no motive anybody can identify, and he would have driven past other schools to get to Sandy Hook if the story were true. It's a real WTF of a situation.







That is just one bizarre situation among zillions. Not much of the rest of the partial list of them that I kept posting here has been addressed. The obituary isn't one of the biggest issues. I don't put it even in the top 30. I just kept asking about it because people kept dodging. Most of my other points are being dodged.

Are you really that stupid, or are you just trolling again? You have claimed multiple times that Emilie Parker doesn't exist. Emilie was a student at the school who got killed, and she is no longer with the family and is gone. You said she is really Madeline. So what does that make Emilie? A person who you believe to have never existed.

Also, I already answered all the points you brought up, multiple times. You just keep ignoring the answers, so I am not going to keep repeating my self over and over. Just go back and read it when i answered you the first time. You keep repeating the same nonsense which have been explained to you a million times, you just seem incapable of understanding even simple concepts.

Oh, really? I said Emilie Parker never existed? Quote me.

No, you were extremely selective about which points from my list you would address. That is why I kept posting it.