hear... hear???
Printable View
hear... hear???
maybe its just a british thing
it basically means i agree with what you said
its like when you "second" statement.
Imran
ok... O_o
i've truly never heard of that..
oh well...
the petrodollar is safe
and we all live happily ever-after
the end
...condescendingQuote:
Tsen stop arguing with him.
He's a teenager, his warped view won't change.
[/b]
and wow xcrissxcrossx you just defined imperialism...I hope it hasn't come to more of that...where's ghandi when you need him? all iraq has are IED's to fight back, I guess they've just traded Saddam for some puppets...what a waste of a few years
Dude. Did that hurt when you pulled that out of your ass?
Seriously. He was basically a religous fundamentalist. He was NOT cracking down on religous fundamentalists. C'mon man. Get some real arguments.
And there is proof that terrorists at LEAST traveled through and were given safe passage by Saddam. I'm just too lazy to look for it.
Get your facts straight and use spell check. Makes it easier to find great gaping holes in your argument, By the way, you didn't even address what I said in the earlier post.
And people who said all the "sinking to Saddam's level" and all that crap, the hanging was justice. Not murder.
And even if Saddam did not have WMDs, all the proof was there to say he did. I personally think he sold it or moved it out of the country.
And he had been defying the U.N. for years, since before I was born. That's enough to go after him by itself, even if the U.N. is becoming corruptish.
Oh well. You know what they say, "Arguing on the Internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."
Ok
your a deluded young man
number one : we are not whatsoever arguing, we are taking part in a debate
an intellectual discussion
part of the reason this section of the forum is here
and post certainly the reasons this thread was created.
Number two: I cant believe that you wont accept my comment about him cracking down on fundemnalkism,
why do you think there was so little sucidie bombins during his era
why do you tihnk, Iran abolsutely despises him.
He saw Islamic fundemntalism as a threat to his reign.
You should be able to accept that, even the most ardent pro-Bush people can see that, people who support the war accept that.
Saddam saw himself as a social revolutionary and a modernizer, following the Nasser model. To the consternation of Islamic conservatives, his government gave women added freedoms and offered them high-level government and industry jobs. Saddam also created a Western-style legal system, making Iraq the only country in the Persian Gulf region not ruled according to traditional Islamic law (Sharia). Saddam abolished the Sharia law courts, except for personal injury claims.
This sounds to me like a secualr leader, abandoning traditonal Islamic governing. A major cause of unrest among Iraqi fundemtnalists.
God help me, im debating with a guy that doesnt post information, he merely posts his afwul attempt at a joke.
For me, a hanging is not murder.
Taking someones life makes you as bad as them. Rergardless oft he reasons, its murder.
And if so, its justice to hang Mr Bush too.
With his illegal wars and coontious murder.
and Blair with him.
IF you cant find WMDs there probably werent any, this has been accepted by many higher ups amongst US pro-war officials.
And so what if ehs been going against the UN. Bush went agenst the UN with this war.
Israel breaks hunders of resolutions a year
even to the point of refusing direct order of a ceasefire.
But I do not support Saddam,
Yo umsut accept,however, that he clamped down on ISlamic fundemntalism
its practically fact
accept it
and my spelling, well, i tend to find only when a person bleieves they have been outlcassed i n debate do they become pedantic
Imran
Absolutely disgusting.
A testament to humans incompetence.
~
Sagea, did u disappear?
Imran
He is dead i seen it in a video