Psychology: A religion for the rational?
I was having a discussion with a friend, who directed me to an article:
http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/
The article states that psychology is not a real science, and is closer to a religion. The main point of the article is that psychological theories do not have to be entirely correct, and are not put through the same amount of scrutiny that would be comparable to other branches of science. Proper tests cannot be done because of ethical considerations, and theories can be published based entirely around opinions, with facts to back them up. Psychology seems a lot like a religion, which tries to diagnose good and bad behavior, and while it has the backing of science, it doesn't have to have near as much support.
I still think that psychology has a more worth than (traditional) religions do, but should it be considered a true science because it tries to draw conclusions based on behavior with the scientific method? I never hear it referred to as a "Liberal Art," and I've never really thought of it that way, but should it be considered that instead of a traditional science?
Mathematics is not a science
Quote:
But once again, psychology has grown a lot and now deserves a lot of credit for scientific research. But I still don't think it is as advanced as e.g. chemistry or mathematics.
Mathematics is not a science. It is a branch of logic and langauge.
Psychology is a science, since it relies on emprical evidence. Psychological theories make prediction, they are testable and can be disproven.
Saying that psychology faces the real world problem like every science. Which, is basically this Does Psychology actually describe real behavior? or does it really test how people react to expriments. However, every branch of science faces this problem. Physics for example, you could ask if your really measuring real phenomna or does your presence have a effect? something that Rodger Penrose called the Quantum paradox i.e. collaspe of the wave function.