haha ... don't worry i'm just bored ... (thats when you basically find me posting here)
anyways ... say hi to all ....
wa'el
vote NADER
Printable View
McCain has his problems, but he has a much better understanding of how the world works than Obama. Obama said we need to invade Pakistan, for example. Study the nature of our relationship with Pakistan, and you will see how that is a sign that Obama doesn't understand what is going on. He will not bring respect to the United States. I can assure you that if he is elected, you will be spending a lot of time with your shaking head down and in your palm. McCain made bad grades, but so did Einstein and lots of others. Grades are not a dependable reflection of intelligence. The smartest people I have ever known were not A students, and some of them were F students. Also, we need left brained people for presidents, not mere artists. I have all the respect in the world for artists... as artists, but they do not need to be in positions that require extremely good reasoning ability, especially when the future of the world is depending on their decisions. If the goal is to elect somebody who is a genius on foreign relations and economics, Shakespeare and Mozart are not the people for the job. I think thatwhenif Obama ever decides to do some tough interviews from people who are not in his political camp, it will start becoming evident that he is pretty lost. McCain doesn't get me excited at all, but an Obama presidency would be a huge disaster. People are playing with fire by trying to get him elected.
YES!!!!!! Liberals, vote for Nader! Nader needs your vote! Spread the word. :wink:
I hope your just messing around with all your PROBERLYs and IDEARs.
Do you think we'll ever have a good choice? I think anyone running for a position like that has to be a little screwed up to begin with.
:D :D :D :D
If all we had were poets and artists running the country, we wouldn't even be the United States of America anymore. By now we would be part of another country.
I'm not pro Democrat or pro Republican, but from what I've seen and heard of Obama. I really don't like or trust the man at all.
Although I don't really trust anyone, especially politicians.
This is the same person as TheCosmicOctopus, but I made myself a new username
The fact is, neither leader is ideal by any stretch of the imagination. I don't think either of them have a complete understanding of foreign affairs. However, even as a figurehead Obama will do a lot more for us than McCain could do with any real actions (or lack thereof). The fact that America is willing to elect a well-spoken, anti-war politician is proof that we are not the belligerent, crazed dopes our president makes us out to be. It's sad that Americans have to travel abroad and be embarrassed about their citizenship.
Einstein's bad grades are a myth, as is the idea of 'left/right brained' people. The idea of an artist running things does not mean you elect someone who can draw. It means you elect a visionary who can see beyond the myopia of our past leaders and bring us some real change in this country. The fact that McCain was in the military does in no way qualify him to take the proverbial 3 AM phone call any better than Obama.
Not sure what you mean. But artists FOUNDED this nation. Anyway, like I said above, I don't mean literal artists.Quote:
If all we had were poets and artists running the country, we wouldn't even be the United States of America anymore. By now we would be part of another country.
Obama is not anti-war. He said he wants to invade Pakistan, though the ridicule that resulted seemed to make that matter go away. He also wants a 16 month withdrawal from Iraq, not an immediate one. He wants to add more troops to Afghanistan. What is at stake for us at this point in history is much bigger than what other countries think of us. That is a trivial matter in comparison to the major issues of these times. The bad image is a result of ignorance and rationalizations any way. Whether terrorists get their hands on nukes and other WMD's is a much bigger concern of mine.
Einstein sucked in school. He was great at math and science, but not the other subjects. He might not have been an F student in them, but he was no honor roll student either. Lots of geniuses made not so good grades in school. My point is that grades are not a dependable measure of intelligence.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1115185.htm
The right and left brain principles are real. There are a few rogue scientists suddenly talking out of their asses lately, but they are defying a great deal of brain physiological analysis and documentation. Even if it is ever legitimately dismissed, my point is still that some people are artistic but not logical and some people are logical but not artistic. Few people are both, but the most brilliant people ever have been both. I am all for artists as leaders as long as they can also reason. Being a great artist alone is not enough to be president of the United States.
No he didn't. Einstein did not suck at school, although he did fail the general bit of the entrance exam, however he got special consideration and was accepted at another university, so basically he passed it.Quote:
Einstein sucked in school. He was great at math and science, but not the other subjects. He might not have been an F student in them, but he was no honor roll student either. Lots of geniuses made not so good grades in school. My point is that grades are not a dependable measure of intelligence.
Anyway, can you name another genius that had not got good grades in school and is considered a genius. Because I can only think of Edison.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1115185.htm
This link just says Einstein didn't fail school
Quote:
So how did the myth that he failed high school start?
Easy. In 1896, which was Einstein's last year at the school in Aargau, the school's system of marking was reversed.
A grading of "6", which had previously been the lowest mark, was now the highest mark. And so, a grading of "1", which had been the highest mark, was now the lowest mark.
And so, anybody looking up Einstein's grades would see that he had scored lots of grades around "1" - which under the new marking scheme, meant a "fail".
And that means that schoolkids can't use that mythconception as a crutch any more - they'll just have to work harder...
This is rubbish. There is somemany counterexamples to this that it stupid. Anyway, Obama is actually very educatedQuote:
I am all for artists as leaders as long as they can also reason. Being a great artist alone is not enough to be president of the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_ObamaQuote:
Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988 and at the end of his first year was selected as an editor of the law review based on his grades and a writing competition.[16] In his second year he was elected president of the law review, a full-time volunteer position functioning as editor-in-chief and supervising the law review's staff of 80 editors.[17] Obama's election in February 1990 as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review was widely reported and followed by several long, detailed profiles.[17] He graduated with a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991 and returned to Chicago where he had worked as a summer associate at the law firms of Sidley & Austin in 1989 and Hopkins & Sutter in 1990.[16][18]
I really don't know many artist who have a law degree.
I read some books on creativity and I pretty sure it can be learnt.Quote:
Even if it is ever legitimately dismissed, my point is still that some people are artistic but not logical and some people are logical but not artistic
This is old, however brain scans have shown this to be too simple. For example evidence for stroke victims and brain imaging of tasks. For example, when some one does mathematics the whole brain lights up and not just the left.Quote:
The right and left brain principles are real. There are a few rogue scientists suddenly talking out of their asses lately
You can't just pull the troops out, you need to be careful. Whats wrong with caution? Even the Iraqi prime minister wants the troops out, however he has a longer deadline.Quote:
He also wants a 16 month withdrawal from Iraq, not an immediate one. He wants to add more troops to Afghanistan.
The terriorist are in Afghanistan, we should be there not Iraq. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and had no terriorist before the Iraq invasion.
Obama is said repeatedily that he would do everything within his power to stop Iran getting WMD's, even military options if needed.Quote:
Whether terrorists get their hands on nukes and other WMD's is a much bigger concern of mine.
I'm all for Obama, we don't see much of him on Brit TV but from what I have seen he looks incredibly intelligent and normal compared to what we're used to seeing from the US.
An assasination might be a possibility though, that's what scares me... America's still full of loads of radical fucktards; more than most of the countries it sees fit to invade actually.
The one thing that does piss me off a bit though is how much attention is payed to him being the 'first black president' though. It's really very hypocritical; under PC you're not supposed to discriminate anybody because of race, but if a black person does well at something you have to praise them endlessly for it as if they're some kind of mental fucktard or something? It just doesn't make any sense, the issue of race should even be mentioned in the media, because that's simply prejudice and racism as far as I can tell. And it's all pretty ironic considering how he's hardly black in the first place.
Wow, congratulations, 2008 and you can finally tollerate a man with a tan. How historic.
Seriously, America sucks.
Read this again:
WTF??? Being an artist alone is sufficient qualification for being president? What are you smoking? I am not even sure if we are having the same conversation. Maybe you are reading my posts too fast. You don't know many artists who have law degrees? Uh... Exactly. WTF????
It is all about primary function. Some creativity is involved in reasoning, and some reasoning is involved in creativity. But most people are much better at one than the other.
I am all for it, but what you are saying is that continuation of the war is necessary. I agree. So does Obama, so he should not be called "anti-war" for that reason and others. That was my point. You really need to slow down and read my posts more carefully.
I have explained that to you so many times it is not even funny. The government of Iraq was terrorist, was a violater of our ceasfire, had a history of WMD programs and terrorism, and was in a strategic location. Nobody who can read thinks the Hussein regime was involved in 9/11. That strawman is really getting old.
Did you read my point in its entirety? How a president will handle the situation is more important than what other countries think of us. In other words, screw what other countries think of us. Let's focus on who will be a better president. Get it? :?
You are on major troll watch.
Would you like to compare notes? Tell me all about how great your country is, and then it will be my turn to tell you about mine.
UK: Maggie Thatcher... yay, we're not sexist.
USA: Um... Oh... :(
Seriously there's no way there would be this ridiculous fuss if one of the election candidates was black in the UK. America is still a very racist country by comparison to the West.
I did not start the nation bashing. I was responding to the person who did. I am not going to just sit there and take it when people make asinine comments against my country.
There is not much of a fuss over the fact that Obama is black. The fuss is over the fact that he has buddied up with too many America haters and doesn't understand foreign policy. By the way, has Britain ever had a prime minister candidate who was black and was one of the top two candidates?
I'm just glad everyone here at DV is enlightened enough not to hold contempt for others on the basis of race, culture and social station.
Not like all those rednecks :P
/sarcasm
This is nonsense, again he has said he supports Israel all the way. McCain is a flip flopper http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ieHw...d.php?t=119223Quote:
The fuss is over the fact that he has buddied up with too many America haters and doesn't understand foreign policy
Anyway, Obama plan is the same plan as the Iraqi prime minister, the terrorist that blew up 9/11 are in Afganistan, which should have been won ages ago. If you look at foreign countries they basically support Obama, look at the Berlin speech today. Bush foreign policy was a failure, if only you could see that.
I think Obama could win the hearts and minds of the Middle east and Europe, not Bush 2.
Agreeing with the Iraqi prime minister on when to withdraw from Iraq proves Obama understands foreign policy in general? I don't think so. The "fuss" I was talking about is actually the "fuss", meaning what the masses are bitching about. Watch Iraq over the coming years and decades and see that the our liberation and preservation efforts were both successes. The threat of the Hussein regime no longer exists, Iraq is on its way to becoming a civilized country of people who don't live in the dark ages (Same goes for Afghanistan.), and we have been killing terrorists like flies. Would you say things would be better if the Hussein regime were still a terrorist government that engages in genocide with no end in sight? I thought liberals were supposed to value rights. :roll:
Bush had no plan after he took over Iraq. There was tons of problems after it and I think Bush thought it would be an easy win. Even in the video McCain says Bush has no plan. I'm not oppose to wars, I'm opposed to dumb wars.Quote:
Would you say things would be better if the Hussein regime were still a terrorist government that engages in genocide with no end in sight?
A good example was body armor, and how soldier got killed because they were not fully equiped. Or what happen to the masses amount of money pumped into Iraq. If the Iraqi defense minister gets put in jail for taking billions of dollars and Iraq minister take holidays every year, then I feel sorry for the puppet Government the US created.
Violence levels going down abit was not due to the surge but many factors. Iraq wants the troops out, they have to stand up. If not we will be in Iraq for a hundred years.Quote:
Watch Iraq over the coming years and decades and see that the our liberation and preservation efforts were both successes.
The terrorist are happy in Afghanistan and there is a new breed of young muslim turning to terrorism because of the Iraq war. It called operation blow back, a good example is the 7/7 bombers that mention Iraq. So nice going, not only are the taliban safe in Afghanistan and Pakistan, America is stuck in Iraq.Quote:
The threat of the Hussein regime no longer exists, Iraq is on its way to becoming a civilized country of people who don't live in the dark ages (Same goes for Afghanistan.), and we have been killing terrorists like flies.
Your first "response" was a tangent, and I agree with your second one. I will talk about your third one since it was on target and I don't agree with it.
The Taliban no longer runs Afghanistan. The people there can vote now, and they vote in higher percentages than we do. Think about that. Even though some nuts are pissed about that and joining terrorist scum groups on that basis, the socio-economic climate is going to improve tremendously over time, and that will take away the stone age mentality so many nuts there have had in recent years. Iraq and Afghanistan are on their way to becoming highly civilized nations.
I disagree, the taliban is in control a good example is schools where most parents are scared to bring them to it in fear their children would be killed. The taliban do daily attacks and the violence levels are high.Quote:
Even though some nuts are pissed about that and joining terrorist scum groups on that basis, the socio-economic climate is going to improve tremendously over time, and that will take away the stone age mentality so many nuts there have had in recent years.
The taliban is tolerated because they let people grow opium, the drugs trade is making them rich and since the money is passed on to the farmers and such they have the power.
The islamic revolution is not stone age mentality, I would go into it like it being started by a political philosopher that was in a France university. However, that would be a tangent.
Anyway, I think Obama would be the best choice, because he is likeable and I think ending the Iraq war and putting more troops in Afghanistan is the right tactic, the Iraqi government can stand on it own feet now and the progress against violence was largely due to them. So I think we should leave them too it, and focus where the real terrorist are i.e. Afghanistan.
I think economic issues will dominate the election, and I think Obama will win on this point, as we are in economic troubles that can be blamed on Bush. McCain is having alot of terriable weeks, I think he is toast.
I guess McCain is the wrong man in the wrong place, as this is clearly a democrat year.
I can't wait for the debates. Obama is much smarter than McCain and he knows it. He's going to make McCain look like a fool :lol:
Sir, you are talking to a redneck.
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/m...g?t=1216932977