Airplane crashes into field, somewhat intact.

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200...rom-denver/?hp

But that just wasn't the case with Flight 93.

A man writes on twitter about his plane crash, and that's news?

Chances are this pilot may have made every attempt at landing the plane. In flight 93 it could very well be possible that it was in a nosedive, no control involved.
skidded off runway??

But seriously, an Jet Airliner, even at a nosedive, would leave at least a minimal amount of debris, but Flight 93 left, i'd say not even enough to fill up a truck? something's wrong there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hercuflea

But seriously, an Jet Airliner, even at a nosedive, would leave at least a minimal amount of debris, but Flight 93 left, i'd say not even enough to fill up a truck? something's wrong there.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arby

---

That is a Phantom fighter jet (not a 757) crashing into a concrete wall (not a dirt field). The two events would likely have two very different outcomes.

On the other hand, hercuflea, the very first few words of the article is that the plane in question "skidded off the runway." What allegedly happened to flight 93 was that it fell from the sky.

Huge difference.

There's only one possible explaination. George Bush and cronies personally had all those "Flight 93" men, women, and children get fake plane tickets, then they were taken from their homes and murdered. The guberment then scattered pieces of a plane in the fields to make it look like there was a plane crash.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Half/Dreaming

There's only one possible explaination. George Bush and cronies personally had all those "Flight 93" men, women, and children get fake plane tickets, then they were taken from their homes and murdered. The guberment then scattered pieces of a plane in the fields to make it look like there was a plane crash.

---

Or maybe, it was shot down.