Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust

[Oneironaut Zero]

As a follow up to the paper "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", a subsequent article - which I had just StumbledUpon - called "Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust" claims to summarize the findings for the non-technical reader. I have to go to work soon, so I haven't yet been able to read through the material, but I thought I'd post it anyway, so that those who get a chance to read it before I do can offer their opinions on it.

[Xaqaria]

I'm not sure how it could be more conclusive than this. Does anyone know if there has been any official or political reaction to this paper?

[Black_Eagle]

Ironic how this guy dedicated a huge page to debunking the thermite theory and now we've got O's article saying they actually found thermite. Not just thermite, however. Super thermite. Seriously, how can it get more conclusive than this? I've been on the fence about 9/11 for a long time, but now I can't see how hard evidence like this can be refuted. I guess we'll find out.

[[SomeGuy]]

I honestly can't decide...so I'll quote South Park. Do you believe everything you're told, Kyle? Excuse me!! Could we get back to the issue, please?! You all don't seem to understand how serious this is!! Now who made dookie in the urinal?! [the boys just laugh] Oh, you think it's funny, huh?! M'kay! M'kay! You're gonna think it's real funny when the police get here!

[dajo]

What I am pretty sure of is that the official story is nothing more than a fairy tale. This is 'pretty big' so I'm not going to point fingers, but I very much would want a re-investigation. Thanks for the links!

[Universal Mind]

Maybe there possibly was thermitic dust discovered there, but I don't think I have any reason to believe it. I don't have reason to dismiss it with certainty either, but it still has not been proven. You can find internet articles saying anything. Who are the guys making the claims, and do they have anything to lose by lying? Do they have anything to gain? My skepticism remains. Also, let's say there were explosions. Then what was the point of the airplanes? Why not just blow up the buildings? Plus, why assume the goverment blew up the buildings? Why not Al Qaeda? I know politicians suck, but if I look at this from the perspective of a juror, there is not enough evidence for any convictions at this point. Reasonable doubt clearly remains.

[Phydeaux_3]

As a follow up to the paper "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", a subsequent article - which I had just StumbledUpon - called "Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust" claims to summarize the findings for the non-technical reader. I have to go to work soon, so I haven't yet been able to read through the material, but I thought I'd post it anyway, so that those who get a chance to read it before I do can offer their opinions on it. I so believe in all of this stuff. I'm a Zeitgeister so it's easy for me to accept this stuff as truth. When you step back an look at the evidence subjectively it's not only improbable that the towers fell from what the Bush administration told us but totally and completely impossible. This, imho, is the worst crime perpetuated against humanity in the history of our civilization. Rotten bastards. Imagine what kharma is going to do to them? Ouch. I still hear that line over and over in my head from Zeitgeist: "You still think some guy in a cave got past NORAD?! Some guy in a CAVE?!"