Well, I don't try and "act like I'm innocent" -- I don't give a damn. Like I said:
Originally posted by Rakkantekimusouka+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rakkantekimusouka)</div>
...knowledge -- and multimedia, which is a kind of knowledge -- belongs to the world, every person.[/b]
and also
Originally posted by Rakkantekimusouka+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rakkantekimusouka)</div>
Filesharing is like religion -- filesharers are to people who believe filesharing is wrong as religious people are to atheists (or is it vice-versa?). Likewise, it's a very controversial topic, and money and morals are inevitably involved.[/b]
To reiterate another emphasized, good point:
<!--QuoteBegin-A Lost Soul@
<!--QuoteBegin-Gwendolyn
If a musician is only a musician for the money, he's in the wrong damn buisness. This goes for writers, artists, or any person who produces entertainment......As a writer, I'd rather have people Download my stuff than not read it at all....
I have to agree with this. I have no problem with people downloading my work to enjoy.
Fine, I won't download the music of lesser-known bands to whom three-hundred thousand dollars is on par with three hundred dollars of my own money. Frankly, I'm an ideal Socialist. Given the opportunity to live in a true Marxist Communist society with about ten other people on an island somewhere, you bet I'm there. Money means little or nothing to me. I make sure I don't forget that it's what the money is getting me that is important, not the bills and coins themselves. So three-hundred thousand dollars probably means more to them than it does me. But I digress...
RIAA lawsuits are BS. The RIAA is BS, frankly.
If I'm a thief, then so be it. So was Robin Hood, if you want to split hairs. (And don't give me "Yeah, well, Robin Hood took money from the rich barons and gave it to the poor people, you're circumventing money going to blah blah blah..." I didn't mean it as an exact analogy, OK? Just a casual observation.)
OK, rant over...for now.
|
|
Bookmarks