Thread: Clear proof that dreams are the fundamental and essential source/manifestation of genius

Uh, isn't this really just making a duplicate of this thread you posted like 20 days ago?

So, what's the clear proof? Studies? Experiments? Anything?

I have three threads now. Every thread is different. Each thread is a very important discussion. That is clear.

This thread definitively and clearly proves that dreams are the fundamental and essential source/manifestation of genius. Did you read this thread at all?

Funnily enough, I did. And apart from your first post (which is conjecture at best and nonsense at worst), I fail to see any proof whatsoever, let alone clear.

For instance, the first sentencereams make thought more like sensory experience in general (for some people sure), thereby improving upon memory and understanding. (How does this work and how do you know?) I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong, but you haven't given me any reason to believe you're right, either. Beside, I'm pretty sure their have been many geniuses throughout history who gave little to no thought for their dreams.

I have provided clear, simple, fundamental, extensive/complete, and consistent proof here. This thread is about genius, and genius and dreams.

Under Extended Discussion, please see Shocking and definitive proof of what dreams really are. That thread involves the fundamental and general nature of dreams. It proves that/how dreams necessarily involve an essential and fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience. Furthermore, it proves/demonstrates how very and fundamentally important dream experience truly is.

Please, let's get some constructive, significant, meaningful, mature, reasonable, and important questions or comments. I would appreciate it. Thanks.

No you haven't and a quick glance at that thread shows an equal lack of citations etc. So, as a constructive (as it can help format your "argument" better), significant (as it could make or break your theory), meaningful (again, make or break), reasonable (I assume its reasonable), mature (as I'm not being insulting or unnecessarily using caps lock), and important (once again, make or break), can we have some semblance of proof that isn't entirely from your mouth? I would appreciate it. Thanks.

Readers, very carefully consider how this is or could be correct before trying to pick it apart. Really, that is how you will improve upon your/the understanding. Keep an open mind please. Also, effort is required. This is a very important thread. There is way too much here to simply say that this is fundamentally or generally untrue. Try to explain why it is correct. If you think it is incorrect, then provide the reasons or proof.

The integrated extensiveness of what is accurate description or representation (of/involving sensory experience, being, and thought/genius) is improved in the highest form or manifestation of genius. Think about it please. Thanks.

Seriously, are you data mining?


Can you please explain this:

Originally Posted by FrankDiMeglio

Really, that is how you will improve upon your/the understanding. Keep an open mind please.

Why do you use both? "your" and also "the".

FrankDiMeglio

Make a Youtube. Or get some one to help you make a Youtube. I would love to see you and hear your voice.

In a Youtube you could also illustrate what you are saying.

... Just a thought.

When I read your opening post, Frank

This is what I hear...

***

Clear proof that dreams are the essential source of genius.

Dreams turn thought into sensory experience.

Dreams improve memory and understanding.

The ability of thought to reconfigure sensory experience is*because thought is similar to sensory experience.

When Thought becomes Dream thought reveals its genius.

Dream experience grows.

Dreams integrated the personality.


Dreams involve an integration of our experiences, with thought.

Dreams involve the*fundamental experience*of growth and becoming other than we are.

So

dreams involve a fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience.

Therefore,

there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

***

Did I hear it right... or not.

What I have written is fundamental/foundational, very important, and correct.

Thank you for your comments. There is very much to consider here. What are your thoughts on all of this? You will first have to give my entire position serious and extensive consideration. What do you agree with? What do you disagree with, and why?

Under Extended Discussion, please see Shocking and definitive proof of what dreams really are, by Frank DiMeglio (me), as you are asking huge and multiple questions that go beyond the scope of this thread.

Thoughts are relatively shifting and variable, and dream vision is relatively shifting and variable. Thoughts are invisible, however. Thought is not visual experience.

The so-called "dream experts" were not even able to begin to basically, fundamentally, extensively, consistently, and accurately describe and understand what dream experience actually is.

I offer a consistent, clear, fundamental/foundational, comprehensive, sensible, extensive, and accurate description and understanding of dream experience.

Originally Posted by gab

Seriously, are you data mining?


Can you please explain this:

Originally Posted by FrankDiMeglio

Really, that is how you will improve upon your/the understanding.

Why do you use both? "your" and also "the".

Originally Posted by FrankDiMeglio

What I have written is fundamental/foundational, very important, and correct.

So you reply to my question about you using slashes with more slashes and no answer. I'm just about ready to shut down this circus.

In understanding my point that genius ultimately derives from dream experience, also note the following:

Genius, the accurate, extensive, and integrated description or representation/rendition/reconfiguration of sensory experience and ideas, derives from dream experience.

Tech Administrator, I already answered.

I had written: "Really, that is how you will improve upon your/the understanding." That means that you and the readers will learn from what I have written.

^^ Oh. Well that clarifies everything.

Frank: you either need to improve the diction of your auto-responder (or improve your reading comprehension and writing skills, if you're actually posting this stuff), or else step forward and speak personally to us in order to gain even an iota of credibility. Otherwise, you can open all the threads you want, and throw up all the unreadable pronouncements you can produce, and your message will still go unheeded and, sadly, mocked. I don't think any of this will help sell your book, either.

In other words: If you are really out there, Frank, work with us. If you fail to work with us, well, then, it becomes safe to assume you're not really out there, and understandable if the mods choose to halt your spam trail.

Reason for this thread being locked http://www.dreamviews.com/extended-d...ml#post2085110