Originally Posted by Patience108
I suppose doing all these things does involve memory ...as first one has to remember to slow down or take time or take that breath of fresh air or look around ... Then on top of that one starts to get a feeling of knowing that one is doing it and enjoy it - taking a simple pleasure in being and experiencing .... Is that how self Awareness is amplified possibly? By this process of remembering and experiencing and enjoying the quality of whatever comes?
It sure is!
I believe accessing memory is the best tool available for boosting your self-awareness/lucidity in a dream (and in waking-life, for that matter). I say more about it here, if you're interested. Also, putting yourself in the moment and really enjoying its qualities is certainly a way to amplify self-awareness -- and the experience itself.
Originally Posted by LouaiB
So, this is pretty much practicing mindfulness and self awareness so i can be more present and mindful in the LD, plus practicing recall so all the experience, details, emotions, sense of presence and 'being there', etc. would be as much intact as possible?
Yes.
Originally Posted by Ginsan
I want to question Sageous, please note that I am not accusing him of being wrong. The poverty of my experience may explain why I'm wrong. "High lucidity without vividness is possible, high vividness without lucidity is possible". Is it really honest to draw conclusions from this? Are these not just the rare cases and is there not actually a fairy consistent correllation between vividness and clarity? It may often stray, but in most cases it is still true. If I misinterpreted your views, please tell me, as this is quite likely
You may have misinterpreted me slightly, Ginsan. I personally tend to equate, in a literal sense, clarity with vividness, and not with self-awareness/lucidity, so I would probably have listed vividness right along with clarity above while at the same time saying that the state of lucidity by itself has nothing to do with either of them. If, however, by "clarity" you mean the level of your lucidity or mindfulness in a dream, then yes, of course I would agree that clarity equals lucidity.
If by "clarity" you did indeed mean "vividness," then I must stick to my guns:
I truly was saying that there is no correlation between vividness and lucidity, period. Yes, you can use your state of lucidity in the dream to heighten vividness, but that enhancement comes with your suggestion (or perhaps just the presence of your focused attention) after you are lucid, and does not come as an immediate byproduct of lucidity.
From my perspective, I am quite comfortable drawing these conclusions. I have had many thousands of LD's, and spent quite a bit of time listening to the accounts of many other LD'ers, and, drawing from that sizable pool of experience, I have found that very vivid LD's are about as common as very vivid NLD's, just as very dull LD's are about as common as very dull NLD's. In other words, a dream's initial quality does not depend on lucidity. These conclusions might not be terribly scientific, but I have found that vividness really is not initially related to lucidity, and that "High lucidity without vividness is possible, high vividness without lucidity is possible" is a fairly honest statement representing something closer to a norm than rare cases. Lucidity is a reflection of self-awareness in a dream, and not vividness.
Just to add to the pile, I think I explored LD'ing and discussed other people's explorations for decades before I ever even heard about this assertion that lucidity must include vividness. Sure there was lots of talk about using lucidity to increase vividness (and clarity) through dream control, attention, and focus, but the quality of the initial dream was never assumed to change with the onset of lucidity (in other words, when lucid you can notice the vividness of a dream that was already present before you were lucid, but your DC "You" simply could not appreciate it) . This connection of vividness and lucidity seems to be a relatively new theme/requirement/expectation for practitioners -- a connection that I wonder may have come about both because the word "lucidity" itself, when looked at sideways, seems to imply greater vividness, or simply because just another misunderstanding of the nature of lucidity wandered into the nomenclature through the repetition of well-intentioned people who might not have fully understood the state (sort of like SP).
[EDIT: I forgot to mention why I made this point in the first place. I wasn't just trying to state a fact or call anyone wrong, but was trying to point out that the lucid experience does not require vividness: You can have a great time in the dullest of dreams, if you allow yourself to appreciate where you really are (in a dream!).
Indeed, some of my most memorable LD's did not have much at all in the way of vividness, because I was focused on the experience itself, and not the pretty pictures. Plus, the duller dreams form an excellent blank slate for creativity, so I often welcome them.
I'd hate to see dreamers abandon their LD's -- or LD'ing in general -- because they initially find themselves in the same dull dream they thought they just left by becoming lucid and are disappointed because the promised vividness didn't burst onto the scene.]
|
|
Bookmarks