Originally Posted by
Samael
Seriously, though. In the interest of philosophical integrity (if there is such a thing), we would have to alter the context once again.
In the original question, there are two options: take the money, kill a stranger, and get your memory wiped, or don't.
If your subject takes the money, then you can be assured that they value their own happiness more than the happiness of others.
If, however, your subject does not take the money, you can't be assured of their altruism. The subject may just be motivated by the desire not to have their mind fucked with.
So, the question becomes, how can you alter the context to remove this error?