What do you make of this discovery?

Watch the first video as it's more informative, and then the second for updated DNA results. What do you think?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moEYqLdupIA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjgjzBZ3mhA

I'm not sure Believe this, in one video dentist pye states that it must have been an adult, later on it is cited that he said it was a 4.5 to 5 year old. If the latter is the case, the baby most likely suffered from a condition what dutch people call I believe "waterhead" Hydrocephalus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . The fact that pye is also an abnormal scientist would also indicate something fishy going on here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dutchraptor

I'm not sure Believe this, in one video dentist pye states that it must have been an adult, later on it is cited that he said it was a 4.5 to 5 year old. If the latter is the case, the baby most likely suffered from a condition what dutch people call I believe "waterhead" Hydrocephalus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . The fact that pye is also an abnormal scientist would also indicate something fishy going on here.

---

Yep, bit dodgy. What about this video? Apparently evidence against these defects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvJkUzgkOh8

I really wouldn't know, but it annoys me how the video lacks a professional feel to it, he keeps mentioning pesky wackypedia things. It doesn't make it seem very credible but then again what would I know.

Because alien skulls look just like ape skulls. Also this.

2/10, should not troll again