Kaniaz said this won't be an exception. How can you be so sure? This is a problem humanity has never faced before.[/b]
Sure, just like every other problem? Banging two rocks together was a new challenge we might not have been sure on how to accomplish. Influenza was, once upon a time, the latest and greatest. The Depression and Wall Street Crash were new mountains that needed to be climbed. Smallpox. Cold war. World War II. My point is, civilisation isn't going anywhere for a long while yet. Besides, I don't know what rates high on your disaster-scale, but those count pretty high for me compared to such a thing as "no oil" (you know, the problem easily solved with things like nuclear power, if you read the article).
An example, you ask, of a fuel running out? Well, wahey:
Fact is, the U.S. has been here before and we got through it OK. During the 19th century the chief U.S. fuel source was wood extracted from the country's vast forests, which were logged off at a rate that takes one's breath away even now. As early as the Civil War conservationists warned of a coming "timber famine." The crisis never materialized. Total U.S. wood consumption peaked in 1907 and declined steadily thereafter, yet the economy hummed on. What replaced wood? Why, fossil fuels, mainly coal. (Coal, incidentally, remains relatively plentiful--Hubbert thought peak production might occur in 2150.)[/b]
(From the Straight Dope article linked earlier).
Now I'm not saying that running out of oil isn't a big deal. It is. It's going to be a right pig when it comes around. But is not a disaster looming on the horizon, if you ask me, and it's certainly not worth worrying about. Especially not when, and I quote, "[there is enough uranium] to last hundreds and likely thousands of years.". I'm feeling quite cosy. Gotta think twice when it comes to believing the first thing you read on a topic.
|
|
Bookmarks