I don't really |
|
-_-... *sigh* |
|
I don't really |
|
I see a major problem with this |
|
"...You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world..." - Terence McKenna
Previously known as imran_p
Well, remember one thing: There are manipulative women out there(Surprise surprise eh? ). Immediatly having the man in the wrong is kinda unfair. Lets say the woman wanted to get back at some guy, gets him wasted, puts down a few herself but nothing too heavy and has her way with the wasted guy. Completely her choice. Has a couple more drinks while the guy is laying passed out, and then the next morning lets the police know that she was "raped." Police go to the guy, grab the guy, arrest him, charge him, yadda yadda. Guy was too drunk to really remember anything, or remember the fact that it was entirely the woman's choice because she didn't get wasted until after she had her way with him. Guy goes to jail, woman gets a nice sum of money for her troubles, when the guy was in reality, innocent. |
|
This space is reserved for signature text. A signature goes here. A signature is static combination of words at the end of a post. This is not a signature. Its a signature placeholder. One day my signature will go here.
Signed,
Me
Hmm, doesn't freedom of choice apply here? Hasn't the woman the choice to decide how smashed she is going to get. |
|
you must be the change you wish to see in the world...
-gandhi
As far as I can see, the law only applies if the man is in complete control, while the woman is drunk/stoned. |
|
---------
Lost count of how many lucid dreams I've had
---------
Thats Nuts, that law could easily ruin tons of guys lifes by manipulative woman, its already easy enough for a girl to change her mind and say she was raped and send us to jail. |
|
The way I see it. It will do more harm to the woman and be better for the male. |
|
Ok I wiould agree with the law if it worked the opposite way also |
|
"...You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world..." - Terence McKenna
Previously known as imran_p
For women, it's rape. For men, it's being friendly. If she's not a lard basket, I can't imagine a man ever pressing charges for rape in this case... |
|
It has been the law in all states for a long time that a woman who is absolutely smashed is not in a state to consent to sex. The problem men have is that an erection is assumed to be a "Yes" when a woman does not have an equivalent disadvantage. The law so far has only been concerned with women who are so blasted that they have no idea what is going on. I have seen women in that state where they babble nonsense and can barely keep their eyes open while some guys joke around about how they could have their way with her if they were like that. Going through with that is rape as far as I am concerned. I just hope the new law, wherever it is, doesn't have some crazy .08 limit or something insane like that. If I ever come across a territory with that law, I am going to pull out a breathalyzer before I try anything. I hope that won't destroy the moment. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
Good thing this is in the UK...otherwise I might actually care. |
|
If I hadn't made me
I'd be more inclined to bow
Powers that be would have swallowed me up
But that's more than I can allow...
isn't it wonderful when people don't take responsibility for their actions... |
|
clear eyes. strong hands.
Bookmarks