Originally Posted by
dodobird
One point you are all forgetting is that there is a distinction between the author of a creation and the "speaker" of the creation, the imaginary person that is the one who say the words that comprise the creation.
For example, if you read a book by X, and the book is written in the first person, then the person in the book that says "I" is not X saying "I", but it is the "speaker" of the creation. The same is true in all art forms, unless it is a strictly autobiographical creation.
So, David Byrne is defiantly not a "Psycho Killer", and John Lennon was not a hypocrite by being rich, and it's not fair to judge his creations by the criteria of his character and life-style.
He created a song that expresses a Utopian dream. You can criticize the song in context of the social, political and religious background of the time in which it was written, but not in the context of what kind of person John Lennon was. There are hundreds of cases where the most beautiful art was created by stupid or not-nice people, a few examples that come to mind: Wagner, Céline, Picasso.