Send an Instant Message to O'nus Using...
Purchases: | 3 |
Refunds: | 0 |
This sounded familiar to the foundings I came across about Deism. Deism is the doctrine which asserts that God exists only as an impersonal first cause of the universe, which then opreates solely in...
Liked On: 12-30-2020, 07:07 AM
Bang on. Do you study evolutionary psychology..? It is possible to experience these orgasms in real life. However, with great difficulty. Dreams are inclined to illicit the most extremes of...
Liked On: 08-23-2016, 07:11 PM
While I think we quintessentially agree, I will comment on what you have said. Yes, objectively. We can take both objective and subjective paradigms into consideration; not just one or the...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:15 PM
Can you not say that a rock is being? A stone has a sense of being. That does not mean it is sentient or conscious. Also, consider that definitions have been revised constantly in the past. ...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:14 PM
I set forth certain arguments for a certain definition of God. We could define God as energy or buddha and I would not be willing to apply these arguments to them at all as the context is...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:13 PM
After reading your post, I must say that I am impressed with your approach to discussion. You seem like a rather well versed and open individual. I hope to see all the more from you on the boards. ...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:10 PM
An omni-God is simply everywhere, knows everything, created everything, etc. etc. That is the God I am tackling. We could re-define this, of course, but I am making this argument towards the...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:08 PM
Yup So I guess we might as well not talk about anything but the weather. Boy is it cold. ~
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:07 PM
I don't know - it's a paramount waste of time. Just like my education and life. What do you suggest..?? (Note; this is not sarcasm) ~
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:06 PM
Please explain how this is not semantics? I believe grapes are oranges. What's the difference? There's obviously more to how you define God, so it is vastly different than consciousness and...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:05 PM
A creator had to create time. A creator cannot be what they have created. Thus, God cannot be subject to time or consciousness. This is the most simply I can put it. The problem is that it...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 12:03 PM
While I think we quintessentially agree, I will comment on what you have said. Yes, objectively. We can take both objective and subjective paradigms into consideration; not just one or the...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 01:43 AM
...? If we stop thinking about it, then it will become entirely relative. I am not trying to make a subjective argument but to objectify it so that we can debate about it. If we avoid...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 01:31 AM
I set forth certain arguments for a certain definition of God. We could define God as energy or buddha and I would not be willing to apply these arguments to them at all as the context is...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 01:08 AM
That's the point. I am not sure why this is often associated with a pejorative tone, but I see no reason for it. Materialism is the only empirical and certain thing that can be systematically...
Liked On: 11-08-2014, 01:02 AM