At the top? I think there would be lots and lots of LSD. |
|
If there were infinite levels, planes, realms, and dimensions in a supernatural world or universe, what do you think would be at the "top"? In my opinion, the "top" would no longer be physical. |
|
Last edited by petersonad; 07-12-2011 at 04:40 AM.
At the top? I think there would be lots and lots of LSD. |
|
If you go by superstring theory, then there would be 11 dimensions. You don't actually need an infinite amount of dimensions, because an infinite number of universes fit into the lower dimensions. So you have an infinite number of things but they still all fit within a finite number of dimensions. All of which are still physical, but take forms we can not really comprehend. |
|
You really have to define your question better. Are you referring to universes within eachother? Because that's different from dimensions. And what do you mean by supernatural? Levels? Planes? And doesn't having an 'inifinte' amount of them by definition mean there is no 'top'? |
|
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
Supernatural = beyond natural. |
|
Non-being. Non-physical occurs before the top. The very tippy, tippy top is the conscious and penetrating void that surrounds and consumes us. God is the darkness. Buah ha ha ha ha. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 07-14-2011 at 07:14 PM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
I'm afraid you're confining the world to words rather than using words to navigate the world. Why don't I just respond with this? |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
It's hard for to explain what I mean by the top. What are was trying to say is that once you reach a point of ascension where you feel that your pretty high, or high enough, what would it be like? |
|
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
I'm no philosopher but it seems like your trying to use a description from whatever we're in right now, I'll say an earthly realm, to describe something that's not of this earthly realm, it's like trying to describe sight to someone who can't see at all. |
|
"For a long time it gave me nightmares, having to witness an injustice like that. It was a constant reminder of how unfair this world can be, I can still hear them taunting him. 'Silly Rabbit, Trix are for kids!'... How come they just couldn't give him some cereal?"
I think it would be Milla Jovovich's vagina. |
|
---o--- my DCs say I'm dreamy.
|
|
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
That's not what nothing is. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
You can't teach someone what nothing is. I suppose if you HAVE to use words to describe nothing, then you defined it well enough. But encasing the idea of nothing into words and assuming you understand what non-existence is because you can describe it inhibits your awareness. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Oh, so now we're talking about linguistic epistemology. Great. |
|
Last edited by Meakel; 07-15-2011 at 03:14 AM.
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
You claim to understand the limitation of words but you don't show any inclination to think deeper than the surface value of the arguments proposed. I made that argument just to show how easily words with loose definitions can be tossed around to make fallacious logic. Let me attempt to exemplify this for you. The most accurate way of putting "You're knowledge on the subject <= Nature," would have been "Our knowledge on the subject..." But I didn't, I put it all on you. You took it offensively, as is natural, but nothing I said is actually offensive. You can only HOPE your knowledge on ANYTHING is less than or equal to nature. I was merely stating fact that every human being must digest. Unfortunately we don't know everything. Worse yet, we don't know anything. If we hope to understand anything, though, first we must postulate that more is than just what exists. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
I'm not still worried about the whole 'your knowledge' thing, I'm past it. But don't attempt to rationalize it by showing my how 'easily loose definitions can be tossed around'. And 'putting it all on me', actually yes that does kind of make it offensive. |
|
Jen was 13 years old. A fairly normal girl. She spent a lot of time online.
One day, she made a new friend. He liked the same bands, worried about the same subjects.
They decided to meet at the local mall. She went. So did he.
Only he wasn't in junior high.
HE WAS A 1500 LB GRIZZLY BEAR.
1 in 5 children online get eaten by wild bears. And you didn't even know bears could type.
Nope... No I definitely had it correct. As meakel said. |
|
I was trying to bring things back to the OPs topic but very well. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Bookmarks