Quote:
Originally posted by Peregrinus
"I am" declares only existence. It makes no claim of either motion or being static, and a statement declaring existence is in no way negated by anything else which might describe the nature of that existence. Descriptions modify and add to our understanding of the fundamental state, they do not negate it, as evidenced by the fact that you had to say "are also becoming". It is something additional and descriptive, not something exclusive.
And there is a smallest unit of time, btw. It's called the "Planck time". One cannot measure change in units smaller than the Planck time, and therefore, for the duration of the Planck time (~ 5.4x10^-44 seconds), a system can be considered static.
If you say "I am" declares existence. Then by that statement we must elaborate what existence is. In order to define wether it can be both true and false or not. Else the statement is useless to us.