Originally posted by AirRick101
Considering the Tower of Babel story from the Bible, do you think when God changed their language, that their skin colours and hair colours and such changed instantaneously?
Of course not. As a linguistics student, I can tell you that languages most certainly evolved gradually, and do not show any signs of having separated instantaneously. I'm not an expert on anthropology, though, but I'm willing to bet we have good evidence that human evolution was gradual too. According to the literal interpretation of the Bible, the Tower of Babel thing happened sometime within the past 5,000 years. And yet, we can track several language families' gradual dissipation into many daughter languages over those years.
For example, through literary records, we can trace the dissipation of Latin into many divergent dialects which gave rise to languages such as Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese and Romanian over the past millennium or so as the dialects changed so much that they couldn't understand each other. We can compare Latin words and grammar to Old Church Slavonic, Ancient Greek, Sanskrit, and what we know of Proto-Germanic and Proto-Celtic, and the forms are way too similar to be due to chance. In fact, by extrapolating the processes of linguistic evolution backwards, we have undeniable evidence that a huge number of modern languages are ultimately descended from a single language called Proto-Indo-European spoken about 5,000 years ago, which then split up into different languages as people spread out geographically, and those groups split up into smaller groups, etc. The modern languages this process gave rise to include Icelandic, English, Irish Gaelic, Spanish, Russian, Modern Greek, Armenian, Persian, Hindi, and Bengali, among many others. Beyond 5,000 years, though, we don't really have enough conclusive evidence to draw any conclusions as to where the proto-languages came from, although there are some intriguing hypotheses out there that Proto-Indo-European might have been related to some other proto-languages, suggesting a hypothetical language spoken some millennia before that point. We have seen similar processes of linguistic evolution at work in a myriad of other language families, such as the Afro-Asiatic languages (including Hebrew and Arabic, which seem to be related to Ancient Egyptian), the Chinese languages, and the Bantu languages.
To assert that all this linguistic diversity came about instantaneously sounds as ridiculous as the idea that God embedded fossils showing evolution in the ground to "test our faith". There's just so much evidence for the gradual evolution of languages that to state it didn't happen is a huge leap of faith unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. It's possible, I guess, but it would require a God that deliberately wanted to fool us into thinking that it isn't the case.
|
|
Bookmarks