Originally Posted by
The
First-off, Howetzer, I'm glad we've managed to figure out the source of the disagreement... yay for stage 1 university logic actually being of some use. I find sticking out arguments in standard form helps occaisionally.
Now, Howetzer, am I correct in presuming that you believe in some form of objective morality? Me, I am a moral subjectivist. I dopn't believe in any objective concept of morality.
HOWEVER in the course of this argument, I'm taking the standpoint of one who DOES believe in objective morality.
So: Howetzer, I STILL think you've failed to explain why their should be a logical connection with natural-ness and morality. The connection you make seems to be based solely around the presumption that natural things "seem" right, and unnatural things "seem" wrong. You still haven't made any logical connection. This is the CORE point, and the one on which 3everything else rests.
You CANNOT make a logical, decuctive connection bewteen natural-ness and morality without positing further premises.
[/b]