thought this was pretty cool
http://www.tenthdimension.com/medialinks.php
Printable View
thought this was pretty cool
http://www.tenthdimension.com/medialinks.php
I saw this before on DV a while ago. It's pretty cool.
oh well,
late to the party, I guess
amusing! :bigteeth:
the relationship between the second and the third still makes no sense to me though....
Interesting. :goodjob2:
Wow, everything is just a point...
I like that video.
My brain hurts.
Kinda confusing, but I get it. In theory however, as we notice each dimension follows a pattern, Point, Line, Split, ect. In theory, this could continue past the 10th dimension, into the 11th and 12th and so on. But our laws we think that the 10th dimension is "All Possibilities" however if the 10th dimension is a point, the next step would be a line connecting One group of all possibilities to another. It sounds strage I know, but its hard to explain. But, as this theory suggests there is more than one universe which can be connected by the folds and lines. That said, whatever all the universes are contained in, the place that houses all possibilities, there may be more of. Confusing? Think of it this way:
Each home holds many people
Each city holds many homes
Each region (State, Province ect) holds many cities
Each country holds many regions
Each continent holds many countries
Each planet
Each solar system
Each galaxy
Each Universe (as this theory suggests)
But what holds each universe? My hypothetical name for this place is called the void, as we don't even know if it exists. But what ever houses each universe, this void, exists within the 10th dimension. This void is what houses all possibilities. Which is true. But, What holds each void? Further, What holds each of what holds each void? Ect. We could move further and further. A line could connect each of these voids, a split another, a fold, a point on and on and on forever. So what is "All Possibilities" may not be All Possibilities.
When it comes to "and what hold the void", I think it's time to just say "this is all a big dillusion" - now it all makes sense!
I think the reason they stopped at 10, was because after 10 it really doesn't matter. Infinity combined with infinity, is still infinity. Same result, no reason to keep going further.
It's such a weird concept, but a cool one. If true, that means, I'll live this life and infinite amount of times, I'll life from another person's point of view and infinite amount of times, I'll be an alien life-form an infinite amount of times... it just, who and how is it decided what is exeprienced next?
Actually, Infinity Combined with Infinity is not Infinity. It is multiple Infinity. Infinity is only our concept of our universe. The theory suggests there are other infinities aka other universes. This "void" that houses all the universes, is "All Possibilities" which is more than infinity; its within Tenth Dimension. Infinity combined with Infinity is one universe combined with another. An 11th dimension would be All Possibilities connected to another All Possibilities by a line, or the Void connected to another Void by a line. 12th would be an All Possibilities Split, 13th a Fold, and on and on and on.
That suggests that there are an endless amount of dimensions, and an endless amount of universes and things that house them.
I think you are looking at it too literally. The tenth dimension isnt a 'house' for all the possibilities, suggesting that there are other 'houses' of all possibilities. It is the POINT of all possibilities. It isn't a 'container'
I think you took what I said too literally. Note how each point is a dimension, the next is a line, the next a split, the next a fold. It repeats at least twice as it makes its way to the 10th dimension. Whos to say this pattern of Point, Line, Split, Fold can not continue? For example:
A point in the 7th dimension is infinity. The 8th dimension is then a line, two points meeting. Infinity to Infinity. A point in the 10th dimension is All Possibilities. The 11th dimension would be a line, All Possibilities to All Possibilities. Followed by another All Possibilities split, followed by a fold, and ultimately the trend continues.
I thourally enjoyed that video. it actually makes a lot of sence when you think about it. It also explains some questions I have been having
This is all wrong.
Well i could explained but i wont. Any book like Roger Penrose road to reality will explain the inconsistancy and flawed logic. First if their was ten dimension then their would be roughly about 32 dimension of rotation, Secondly he has neglated quantum mechanics, lastly the mathematics is infintly more complex then that and it doesnt stop at ten it keeps on going to infinite.
So this may seem like a explanation to the mystery of higher dimension but it not. I hate string theorist, quantum mechanics all the way.
I see this time and time again.
Why are you so presumtuous?
You read one thing and then comes a flood of new topics that is the truth.
You are a very narrow minded person from Forum experience.
Try to take a look at the whole picture for once rather than adhering your beliefs to one set of principles that change in the event you read part of a new book. :shakehead2:
It was entertaining to watch lol. Does it really matter if it is wrong sheesh its not all that serious but very entertaining nice idea.
I agree with Howie here. I've never once seen you agree with something. Your always the one in the right. Everything is wrong unless you say it.
As for the "infinity part" they didnt say Infinity stops at 10. Actually, the 7th dimension is the infinity, and it doesnt stop at 7. What they are saying is that the 7th dimension contains 1 infinity. It doesnt end. They never said it ends. It doesnt even have to be called the 7th dimension, its just a name. You could call it anything, but it still contains an infinite amount. Again, it was never said to stop. They never said it didn't keep on going. There is just more then one infinity, or more then one endless "point." Aka our Universe(s)
Well i have a high level of understanding of mathematics of higher dimensions, and maybe to you i seem presumption but i am not. See it just that it riddled with stupidity like treating time the same as any other which is clearly in vialotion of Einstein 3:1 signature, then after that it just get more crazy like saying infinty which is senseless. Also it doesnt even mention complex dimensions we need this to describe the fundamental behavior of a particle. Plus the whole things isnt even about higher dimension because dimension itself is a concept that cant explain the universe, nor does it even explained why we only see four dimensions. See the higher dimension are really complex phemones which has been dumbing down, well a good example when he says the fourth dimensions is time, which is really stupid because of something call fourth dimension object a good example would be a Kleim bottleQuote:
I see this time and time again.
Why are you so presumtuous?
You read one thing and then comes a flood of new topics that is the truth.
You are a very narrow minded person from Forum experience.
Try to take a look at the whole picture for once rather than adhering your beliefs to one set of principles that change in the event you read part of a new book. [/b]
http://alem3d.obidos.org/i/kbottle/kbc1.png
It would be crazyness to explain the etc dimension as time that makes the kleim bottle possible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_bottle if your too lazy to read it a kleim is something where it inside is it outside and in four dimension their is no need for the glass to pass through itself.
I am seeing the whole picture and for reasons above that video is wrong.
do you even realize what you have just said?
well yesQuote:
do you even realize what you have just said?[/b]
Apparently not, because they covered what you just said in the video only worded differently. They used that strip of paper idea as an example.
so your saying you can fold a three dimension object like a piece of paper into a four dimensional object like a Kleim using time as the only other dimension to make it four. Call me skeptical but i think not. If you still have a problem i bring in impossible objects.Quote:
Apparently not, because they covered what you just said in the video only worded differently. They used that strip of paper idea as an example. [/b]
Just as you know there is no subconscious. You also know that lucid dreaming is bad for you as well as the entire scope of the art world. Now you have empowered the thought of quanta. :roll:Quote:
Well i have a high level of understanding of mathematics of higher dimensions, and maybe to you i seem presumption but i am not.[/b]
You are in over your head. Given the time and effort to prove many off of your posts wrong, it would be most evident.
Take a look at a few examples of getting in over your head and trying to bullshit your way out.
http://www.dreamviews.com/forum/index.php?...c=41004&hl=
http://www.dreamviews.com/forum/index.php?...c=39688&hl=
So what's the next read gonna be?
I really am trying not to be rude. It is difficult to respect a member that boasts to know something new from day to day. Then quote his rebuttal from books.
So what's the next read gonna be?