Quote:
"Nothing happens for no apparent reason", any proof of that?[/b]
Science itself has proven that one, your arguement for that one would hold sway if we lived in the middle ages. You can look at any natural disaster or weather patterns and you will see a reason behind it.
"Also, I think you are ignorant, for thinking you know the meaning of life"
I think you are very ignorant for believing that quote. I have already said i don't know the meaning of life hence the quote..
"I will now try to explain what i think life is all about."
Quote:
I think you have very little understanding of words. I think it is pretty sure that on a greater scale, on an universal scale, something way before and beyond humankind, human emotions have no value. Especially if you go into the M-theory/parallel universes, since it would imply infinite possibilities, choice doesn't chance existence of a possible reality.
Subjectively, I care a lot about emotions. I am human after all. [/b]
I have a great understanding of words, i can also tell you that English is not my first language. To say emotions have no value is wrong and nothing can be further from the truth, every creature has emotions which shapes their personalities and makes them what they are, without those emotions they cannot live. You obviously prefere a zombee like existance. But yes i agree on a larger scale they hold little value.
Quote:
Read a few posts back, I posted the definitions 'Nature' can have. Your 'fact' is proven wrong by the English language. Also, I knew 2 posts back that you mean laws of the universe are nature. You don't have to say that again.[/b]
It says "nature and it's phenomena" that doesn't prove me wrong at all. I have also stated no facts at all just what i think.
Quote:
You are wrong again, I did know that already. I also know what cases that: the receptors in your eyes get used to that color, causing an opposite colored-lining around the object. [/b]
That is not an aura, you obviously can't tell the difference between the two, an aura changes colour, especially around animals and is a lot brighter than what you have already discribed which is also true. But trust me they are different, again you have just thrown away something that is true just because it doesn't agree with what you believe.
Quote:
I know there are some medival pictures with God holding a sphere that looks like an earth, it doesn't take away the fact that people were burned for saying the sun didn't revolve around the earth. Also, people also hear allah, are THEY right? Not as right as you hearing your souls, are they now? Seriously, if anyone is ignorant it is you, to the mind's Incredible imaginative capabilities, dear sir.[/b]
Once again you show your complete pig ignorance because you don't like what you are reading.
1: It is Atlas, not god.
2: People knew the earth revolved around the sun for thousands of years.
"also people hearing allah, are they right?" can you prove them wrong?
Dear sir, your problem is that you are unwilling to understand. Your problem is that you let science prove everything, if science can't prove it then it can't exist in your eyes, like the E=MC2 theory, that was blown wide open a few years back when they found something in space that didn't correspond to that theory. I know i'm right about auras and souls and you can live and die in ignorance like most people do.
Quote:
Because it is so easy? I find your theory pretty weak, yet you show a horrific sense of having the feeling you are right. Also, you take criticism worse then religious people, what also makes it funny. If your theory is so true, you should be able to make me understand, yet you fail drastically. [/b]
You don't have the mental compasity, it is not weak you just too stupid to understand. I didn't say i was right at all, this is what i think. You have got it into your head that i'm some how right when i have clearly stated the opposite. To be honest you haven't criticised me at all, you are just arguing for the sake of it.
Quote:
I also posted what I believed was the 'meaning of life', a few posts back. You ignored that part of my post, along with a few others.[/b]
I did not ignore it, it was just so pathetically stupid and worthless theory that i could not be bothered to argue with you about it.
Quote:
Basically, you are a Deist. Also, a Deist with views I find somewhat resemblant to the Nazi's, who also only wanted the best to survive.[/b]
Thats because thats the way it is meant to be, if you are born with a crippling illness, you die. That is how nature intended it to be. The Nazi's believed in a master race and superior to everyone else, it isn't quite the same, is it?
Quote:
What however is even more interesting, is your COMPLETE and UTTER lack of any proof for your theory.[/b]
theories are nether right or wrong, you don't always need proof for a theory, just like E=MC2 or your m-theory or countless other theories through history, if you open your eyes you will see what i mean.
Quote:
Like I said, see theory a few posts back. I can sum it up: Life has no objective goal, just a subjective, human, goal of living life as good as one can. Death is the end, supernatural things are extremely unlikely, a possible explanation of things before the big-bang is the M-theory. That is about what I believe.[/b]
I disagree with that. Supernatural are likely, can you prove otherwise?
Yes a possible explanation of things before the big bang but it might not be true, can anyone prove that? You now see what i mean.
Quote:
I didn't know Criticism was bad, not like it is an important factor in both democracy and science. If you want to have theories that are unsupported by proof and ratio, be my guest, but if you post them into the public domain, I will criticize them, because I personally believe you are wrong, and I hate mis-information.[/b]
I don't mind criticism if it is structured, attacking me out right which is what i don't like :blue:. So if your theory above was proven wrong (which it could be) i could maul you for mis-infomation, a Theory is mis-infomation to a degree because it is not proven to a acceptable level, my point is that the proof is all around you if you look, not much but it is there.
I'm gonna end this debate now because we are going round in circles , We can agree to dis agree if you will :wink: . See you around.