The Invisable Pink Unicorn
This vexes me!
Why do people assume once they have mentioned the PU or FSM they have won an argument? How can they know it isn't real? On what do they base the assumption that it is UNLIKELY?
When Atoms where first postulated way back in the times of Ancient Greeks, they LAUGHED at the man, as they said it was UNLIKELY ...
How is the PU or FSM or YT any less plausible then the Atom?
Would the Greeks have thought the same of both the FSM and the Atom?
What of those other subatomic particals? What of things yet to be discovered. They can't be detected now, but one day perhaps ...
Think of the Atom ...