So far you have said that rationality cannot describe what you are talking about and that it takes unreason to comprehend your universal truth and your knowledge. How can we understand what you are trying to convey to us when you also say that rationality and reason cannot speak of it?
Is this not the very basis of the problem of subjective representation in language? Stop talking about this.. move on to topics that we can talk about.
You might as well be saying nothing.
Please see my post in Synchromysticism.
~