Hi Tsen,
I hesitate to call my worldview "Buddhism," but it is highly informed by and largely in accord with the teachings of the Buddha as I understand them so far. You'll find a lot of different kinds of "Buddhists" out there, as with any religion--some as dogmatic as any born-again right-winger, others so vague and ill-informed that they could fit any religious category, or none.
My view of what the Buddha taught: First, beliefs aren't central, practice is. The Buddha's aim was to eliminate suffering and the causes of suffering; his path was to develop a clear view of all phenomena, without any prejudice or obscuration; his means on this path was meditation. Having attained his aim for himself, he set out to teach others, and did so for fifty years, generating a large body of texts (transcripts of verbal instruction). All of the teachings on rebirth, karma, no-self, etc. are only aids, however--one can come to an intellectual understanding of any of these, but without applying effort to meditation to verify them for yourself, you cannot escape the causes of suffering.
The central insight that freed the Buddha from suffering and opened all knowledge to him was dependent origination. There were many teachers in the Buddha's time--different schools of Brahminism were the most "traditional" and dominant, holding that there was a creator-entity that must be worshiped, and that he valued his priestly caste above all others. Others taught of an ultimate "self" that could be realized through meditation. The Buddha studied under the most famous teachers of his time for six years, and found them lacking. He practiced extreme asceticism, barely eating and abusing his flesh nearly to the point of death, all with little result. Finally, he took a bowl of rice and milk offered by a peasant woman, then chose a nearby tree, sat down, and vowed not to rise until he had solved for himself this problem of suffering. He saw that all the "Ultimates" and "Ideals" were illusory--there was no supreme being, nor any ideal self. Everything instead depended on everything else for its form and identity. Nothing existed in and of itself in any lasting way, but instead all forms were impermanent, all things depended on almost infinite causes, and gave rise to almost infinite future forms. Suffering depended upon attachment and aversion to these impermanent forms, and fundamentally upon ignorance or forgetfullness regarding the real state of things, the deep unity of all phenomena.
I'm offering, of course, my limited understanding. For a broad view of many different schools of Buddhism, check out E-SANGHA at http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php? --it's the most active and diverse Buddhist forum I've found. I'd also recommend The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, by Sogyal Rinpoche, and The Way of Siddhartha, by David SomethingHindi (I forget, and I gave the book away). The first is an overview of Tibetan Buddhism through all the stages of life; the second is a very down-to-earth biography of the Buddha, from childhood to death.
Xisdence--be careful with FWBO. While there are definitely some devoted practitioners among them, there has also been a pattern of sexual misconduct in the organization, from the founder on down. I've heard specifically of bad experiences with the New Zealand branch within the past couple years. It is a British organization, and you know where the English traditionally send their troublemakers
|
|
Bookmarks