Thread: Abstract

Originally Posted by ClouD

Life is expression - interaction with others, communication.

What I meant by non-experience is having no idea of form and prose, then there is the greatest creativity - even if the result has form. I am saying the experience, or non-experience of expression/communication is the art itself.

You can replace the word experience with interpretation, but that incites ideas (if that's not exactly what interpretation is) which is not experience - thinking about life is not living it, and without thoughts there are no words, no form, there is life/expression as it is, there is creativity. This is what I mean.

If you belive life is expression okay, but my point, you cannont deny that, life is the interpritation of what you are calling expresion. Without experience of your expression it cannont be lived surely?

So your saying the idea in the conciousness is art? Before it is interpeted by another?

But if thinkign about life is not living it then what is this art in your mind and what is art once it is created? Surely none of these things are true without interpritation.

I can experience anything, but without interpritation through it is meaningless. Human meaning comes from emotion.


These are my views so im not sure how i can back any of this up with famous philosophers, but i hope im doing a good job of explaining.