go??? |
|
go??? |
|
you can't do that on the internet!.... wait yes you can do it again!
Answer the question, I want to know what you all think about the subject. |
|
Maybe we don't have any will. Maybe it just seems as though we do. |
|
FaatFaat
Well, I believe that the future already exists, so it isn't really determined by choice -- so the nature of the will is that it isn't "free will". |
|
Now permanently residing at [The] Danny Phantom Online [Community], under the name Mabaroshiwoou.
Adopted OvErEchO, ndpendentlyhappy
Raised ShiningShadow
Free will is such a controversial and paradoxical concept!! |
|
naturals are what we call people who did all the right things accidentally
I'm not talking about free or determined will, but will, the will to act. |
|
Well, human progress is pure will. If we look at the evolution on basic man's life, it's come a long way. |
|
is it will? |
|
This reality is like a goldfish bowl. The dreamworld is the same, but larger. It's easy to get lost.
I like to think of will as the "choice-tree". You start as a child down on the thick part of the tree. As you grow, to a certain point, your action is influence highly by the surroundings you grow up in. This lead you a special way, almost lets say uncontrollable, until you start taking your own choises. In here comes the all the differnt branches on the tree. If you make a choise here you will follow a certain branch. Since you made that choise you will never be able to jump on another branch again. On the branch you on now there are many minor branches and minor underbranches again. Even if you in the middle of the branch there is a leaf at the end, even if you cant see it. |
|
Let's think of the nature of choices though, Jammy. You say that you have many choices... but in fact you will only ever make one of them. Let's say you think about all the "options" you have for a while... eventually you come to your decision. And I ask you "Could you have chosen one of the other choices?" You would most likely say yes, but how is that possible? |
|
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang, but a whimper.
T.S. Eliot
"Will" is just the high-level representation of what your brain has decided through lower-level means. In a scientific study, when people are asked to tap their finger at a random time, their EEG picked up their intention 3/4 of a second before they actually tapped. To bring personal experience in, I once smoked way too much pot and ended up doing things before I willed them to happen. I touched a doorknob, then i decided to touch the doorknob. It was a bit frightening, seeing as it didn't go away for about 24 hours and I was driving around less than 12 hours later. |
|
That is pretty freaky Simon. |
|
If you're referring to willpower and how much control we really have of our own choices (consciously), then you might find my previous topic interesting: Belief & Willpower |
|
Tips For Newbies | What to do in an LD
Unless otherwise stated, views expressed in this post are not necessarily representative of the official Dream Views stance. Hell, it's probably not even representative of me.
|
|
Super profundo on the early eve of your day
*edit* oops mistook the topic. |
|
Insanity is the new avant-garde.
I believe that what we experience as "will of the mind" or our "concious" will (eg: thinking... man I want a glass of milk) is nothing more then nerve impulses in our brain. No will actually exists in the Cartisian sense (eg freewill). |
|
There are great truths and there are trivial truths. The opposite of a trivial truth is obviously false. The opposite of a great truth is also true.
-Bohr
One question I have is if there is a cartesian will(a will separate from the body), then why does it only affect the actions of the body? If it is truly a separate, spiritual entity, then why is it restricted to the puny human form? Could it be that there is a will like this that is universal, but that we only experience a limited part of it through our human form? Either way the will isn't really our own. |
|
Super profundo on the early eve of your day
I dont think the will can servive without a body. It needs the brain to make thoughts for it to decide on and decode the physical world. The will to me only has 2 functions decisions and communicating with the brain. sense it does not exist in the phyisical world it must be in contact with something that can interpret this world and a body to explore with. |
|
GP d-- s: a--- C++ U? P L E? W+++ N++ o-- K- w O M- V ? PS+ PE- Y-- PGP--- t- 5? X R+ tv+ b+ DI? D? G e- h- !r y**
But if you define the self not as a thinking entity, but a percieving entity then isn't the will just another thing that is percieved, or maybe even a part of the mind. |
|
Super profundo on the early eve of your day
The will does percieve the brain but it also makes decisions like what to think about all it takes is just a tiny bit of will power to think. also the brain can send info back like feeling smelling seeing. I think that if there is such a connection then shouldent this perciever beable to communicate back. Robots dont have this ability and if everything else is so perfect then why are'nt we. why do we need a perciever anyway so we can just watch are life roll by? and then what if we die what will we do, be forced to perceive more I wouldent see the point without free will. |
|
GP d-- s: a--- C++ U? P L E? W+++ N++ o-- K- w O M- V ? PS+ PE- Y-- PGP--- t- 5? X R+ tv+ b+ DI? D? G e- h- !r y**
I don't know if I can define what "will" is in words or even have the capacity. What is the ultimate motivateing force behined what I do? I think that is a question wrapped in an enigma. I do feel however that we were given free will for a reason. Whithout a free will you really couldn't be an individual, a separate entity. Without a will you wouldn't be able to determine for yourself what you are what you stand for ect. I'm not very religious, but I do believe in a creator and I believe we were created to be companions. I believe we were givin our own will to decide our own path and to become, well "ourselves". If I were God I wouldn't want a bunch of carbon copies of myself running arround. It's like with my own children, I want them to have all the benefits I did as a child, but ultimately to have the freedom of choice to become whatever they want to be. In my limited human capacity I think that might be how our creator sees us. You can tell them and tell them and tell them, but they just won't get it untill they figure it out for themselves. The paradox of free will. |
|
I think the will is another medium of perception related to thought that doesn't correlate to any of the others in a very direct way and so we don't really understand it very well. I don't think it is an expression of our true selves, but an external process. |
|
Super profundo on the early eve of your day
Ok were talking axioms now, I like this. |
|
Bookmarks