Sandform, I agree with that mostly. sorry for the misunderstanding.
I still stand by my original point though.
Hay I don't mean to come across as attacking you or anyone else, so please don't anyone take offense at how I talk.
Printable View
Sandform, I agree with that mostly. sorry for the misunderstanding.
I still stand by my original point though.
Hay I don't mean to come across as attacking you or anyone else, so please don't anyone take offense at how I talk.
It is easy to get lost with words.
I read "You are nothing. Stop trying. Stop speaking." quite absolutely. But I don't understand clearly, because you were not very elaborate, nor comforting.
However:
1. If you were emphasizing humility, then I am with you.
2. If you were emphasizing that no "person" can be enlightened, I am also with you in that sense.
But I don't see what you mean by saying "we are nothing" yet you are "in-between nothing and everything". Please explain?
Is the answer 'meringue'?
ClouD may have a valuable message for me, but have not understood it yet. He has not explained what has been "covered", but only alluding to it. This is a risk to me, because I am getting confused with the allusions.
They can be counted easily (if they are known at all).
Glimpses are of spectacular brilliance. One never forgets.
If one reveals they are all one and the same.