Originally Posted by
Invader
That's what I underlined as well.
The professer argued that I was incorrect, that,
was the conclusion.
My reasoning (for my answer) is as follows,
Swimming -> easy to float on the surface, hard to dive deep.
Thinking -> easy to think on the surface, hard to think critically (deep).
Therefor, Swimming and Thinking are similar.
Even though it's a simile I maintained that it's structured similarly to
hypothetical syllogism. The professer, on other hand, claimed that the
phrase "As you may know" is being used as a premise indicator. I refuted by
saying that 'as you may know' is not the equivalent of saying 'you do know'.
I'm still confused.
I still think I'm correct.
[EDIT] I should further explain his reasoning, which looks more like:
Premise: Thinking is like swimming.
Premise: In swimming it's easy to float but hard to dive deep.
Therefore in thinking it's easy to float but hard to think deep.
But I feel like there's a serious error occurring here. There's no relation of support between the two (in this case) premises that assert that the similarity is
built on this specific characteristic. There could be a number of other characteristics that thinking and swimming have in common that can create the
similarity. I think I'm going to use the term incorrectly because this is not an "If A then B" argument, but it looks a lot like he's making an affirming the consequent error, or something a lot like it. We haven't gotten into analogies yet, so I'm not familiar with what the appropriate term would be.