Intelligent Design? I think not

[wasup]

ID bases itself on the idea that a creator created us because we are so 'perfect.' My question is, why did he give us vestigial organs and body parts (Basically, useless ones). For example... The Appendix The coccyx Wisdom teeth Male Nipples Would someone explain 'god's purpose' for including these oh-so-useless organs? Or, perhaps, they used to have a use (some of them), but due to evolution, they are now unnecessary?

[Replicon]

Well, some will argue that the intelligent design was actually 'life' in general. They built a planet that can sustain life, and they created "carbon based life" (unicellular), and let us evolve. ...heh but let's face it, ID is not a philosophical movement. It's a creationist agenda, so they'll never concede to that, because that would mean conceding to evolution. It's too bad, cause in that context, evolution and ID could exist together very happily.

[homer2020]

ID bases itself on the idea that a creator created us because we are so 'perfect.' My question is, why did he give us vestigial organs and body parts (Basically, useless ones). For example... The Appendix The coccyx Wisdom teeth Male Nipples Would someone explain 'god's purpose' for including these oh-so-useless organs? Or, perhaps, they used to have a use (some of them), but due to evolution, they are now unnecessary? Appendix: I'm pretty sure that the appendix was used for raw meat and we slowly stopped needing it and became useless (this is what I've been told ) The coccyx: "The coccyx provides an attachment for muscles, such as the gluteus maximus, and serves as something of a shock absorber when the person sits down, although forceful impact can cause damage and subsequent bodily pains." (wikipedia) Wisdom teeth: For those times when we had something really tough to chew. Or when people lost their teeth at the age of 10 and people needed some more teeth (not fact ) Male nipples: To know when it's cold out? (personal interpretation)

[sogart]

I think the ID people just want to interpret the "origin" of life and they are not contending with evolution, It would just be ridiculous to argue against evolution through natural selection as the examples are far too numerous (and we can actually see evolution of traits in the lab, and population changes in nature). The origin of life (the change from non-life to life) is a really more complicated problem where science doesnt yet have a good explanation and so the ID people can find a place to use God. That's until a good explanation is found (maybe life created in the lab from basic chemicals?) and then they will move god to the creation of the planet or the creation of the universe... the gods used to live a few km from my place, then they moved them to the sky, now they go back in time and far away to the big bang until people decide there is no reason for them existing at all...

[joey11223]

well also if you magnify say a part of an arm like 100x...ewww its not a pretty place, skin full of cracks and hairs kinda ripping through messy flaky craters. It's hardly the image of perfection..

[wasup]

You'd be surprised sogart, most fundamental intelligent design advocates disagree with evolution, despite the scientific evidence. Homer, I think you are missing my point. I realize WHY the organs are there - becuase they USED to serve a point, but evolution has made them pointless. But using the logic of Intelligent Design - that evolution did not exist, makes the existence of these vestigial organs very unusual. Because god supposedly made us perfect, but he gave us such useless organs (According to the theory).

[homer2020]

The point is that at one point they were useful, I don't see why that disproves that God created us perfectly just because we don't need them now.

[Sortilegio]

God made us perfect for when we had to live in caves and eat raw meat, now that we have houses, cigarretes and bombs, who needs god.

[Kal8]

males nipples prove that males are the beta version of females

[Replicon]

Male nipples were designed to cut glass when it's cold. Everyone knows that.

[wasup]

Homer you are misunderstanding me... do you know what the theory of intelligent design is? It's that god created us "perfect" and that evolution isn't true. We were simply created this way, as we are. Therefore the vestigial organs would, according to that theory, make no sense, becuase in the theory of intelligent design evolution isn't true.

[joey11223]

aye and like i said, we wouldnt look soo yukky up close, we would be nice and smooooth. or a better example, why do we have a tail bone?

[sogart]

I found this page and remembered this discussion. A list of useless human organs etc https://notes.utk.edu/Bio/greenberg....ocument&Click= oh and the appendix is for cellulose not protein (its similar to cows having 4 stomachs and having to chew cellulose again and again to digest it)..

[joey11223]

yeah the appendix was for when we chewed on rough vegetation wasnt it? Quite a while ago really, are our appendixes shrinking? Becuase all they do is get infected badly:p

[Sornaensis]

"All animal embyos are inherently female, it takes an extra chromosome to be added at a certain developmental state to make them male..." -- DR. Wu That explains male nipples.

[Sornaensis]

so technically, genesis is SUPER-wrong by saying women come from men.

[Neruo]

The appendix is evolution's penis that rapes intelligent design. It might be a small penis, but it keeps on raping, and raping, and raping. Eventually the Anus of IT will get sore, and people will see it's a silly unscientific theory.

[Ynot]

For example... The Appendix The coccyx Wisdom teeth Male Nipples just to add to the list.... - Oesophagus located behind windpipe so food has to pass over windpipe to be swallowed this can cause choking would be better if they were swapped around - The eyes of mammals (including humans) are inside out, with the nerves and blood vessels located on the surface of the retina, rather than behind it This gives mammals a blind spot in their vision This arrangement is specific to mammals, and doesn't appear in invertebrate creatures' eyes - Our bodies cannot produce vitamin C due to a defect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-gulonolactone_oxidase "Animals that have lost the ability to synthesize vitamin C are, notably: simians (primates), guinea pigs, the red-vented bulbul, fruit-eating bats and a species of trout."

[Sornaensis]

wow, lol, ID just got PWN'ed.

[Ynot]

wow, lol, ID just got PWN'ed. well, not from their point of view any biologist worth his salt could come up with a much longer list of "defects" but the ID crowd always has a reason why such defects exist usually along the lines of "well, we were created perfect, but after eve ate the apple and humanity was cast out of Eden, defects crept in as we were now on our own and without god's aid" these arguments really aren't anything new

[Sornaensis]

PWNage is PWNage, wheather the PWNee like it or not .

[Replicon]

so technically, genesis is SUPER-wrong by saying women come from men. Not if nipples come from ribs.

[Sornaensis]

??? yea, that makes sense.

[Replicon]

Do I look like I'm trying to be serious/make sense? :p

[zhineTech]

"evolutionary theists" maintain that god put the whole of life and evolution on the track and sent it rolling, therefore to them vestigal organs arent a particular challenge. but ID is merely a politically correct stab at trying to sneak creationism into schools. i mean if you went up to an ID'er and said "I believe aliens designed us as a genetic experiment" i think they would get very upset even though they are "scientifically" just proposing "a designer" of some kind. the aliens be trying to steal gods thunder and all that.