Does it include the one about the banana? Where they suggest due to the ergonomic fit of a banana in our hand, that God must've deemed it so....and yet, they've clearly not seen what an uncultivated banana looks like. |
|
This is awesome. It gets right to the point and quickly tears apart the major creationist arguments, all of which have shown up repeatedly in this forum. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
Does it include the one about the banana? Where they suggest due to the ergonomic fit of a banana in our hand, that God must've deemed it so....and yet, they've clearly not seen what an uncultivated banana looks like. |
|
Just watched it - not bad until they counter some creationist arguments with the 'appeal to authority' fallacy themselves. |
|
The complex eye argument is in there, but Ray Comfort's banana is not. The banana argument is not one of the most common ones, but I think it should make the top 10 funniest creationist arguments ever. I think the argument about ants not growing in peanut butter over night is the #1 funniest creationist argument of all time. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
Oh no, when he opened that jar of peanut butter, there was no new life in it! Aargh! The whole theory of evolution is foiled! |
|
I think the award for funniest goes to the crocoduck: |
|
Wait a minute... scientists have not found any transitional species... except for species displaying wide genetic drift until environment circumstances bottle neck and remove disadvantageous variations or one supremely advantageous variation spreads through the species. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
How about the giraffe.....a cross between a camel and a leopard? It should be the Cameopard! lol. Aside from the absurdity of his claim, we also don't classify an organism based on the fact it looks like other organisms. |
|
Who looks outside, dreams;
who looks inside, awakes.
- Carl Jung
Bookmarks