Now, for what I think about God influencing human interaction. God is a concept that, without being passed on from generation to generation, would not exist. With nothing but a book (with hand selected entries and many revisions) and your community to go on, how can you determine God, in fact, exists? Now, your belief isn't any of my business, not until it comes to how you treat other human beings. But, without any kind of concrete evidence at all (let's face it, the community is made of people, and people are wrong all the time--the holy book is merely text, and books of fiction do exist, and even history has been fudged... all in all a single book is poor evidence of anything), there is no reason your belief in His existence should impact how others are treated in society, or how you are treated by society. Your faith is something deeply personal, and something like that isn't bad at all. You can't be blamed for something as harmless as a belief. Of course, so long as that belief does not impact anybody but you. So, why is it that law should be influenced by faith? Why should a personal belief impact millions and even billions of others that have different personal beliefs of their own? Why should abortion be illegal when complications with the pregnancy can permanently affect the mother, even kill her? Now, I'm not trying to get an abortion debate going, you don't have to be religious to be against it. I'm just saying that if faith alone is what is determining your opinion, it's a mistake. Something many shades of grey can be turned black and white because something as simple as the word of God gets thrown into the mix. Let's look at Sharia Law. Why should women be genitally mutilated, or forced to cover up entirely or else be blamed for any sexual assault or misconduct at the hands of a man? Let's look at most mainstream religions. Why should being gay be a sin? Most of the time, it's arguable, one's own insecurity or feelings of disgust are the true meaning for discrimination against homosexuals and God is simply used as an excuse (which in my eyes is pretty sinful). Killing, throughout history, has not only been in the name of God, but commanded by God.
Now, I'm not going to blame modern Christians for the crusades or moderate Muslims for Jihad or anything like that. To do so makes no sense and destroys any point I'm trying to make. At that point, I would simply be attacking strawmen in an effort to build "evidence" for an ad hominem argument. It would be like blaming all modern white people (that may have even recently moved to America from Europe or something) for the slavery of blacks. The point I am trying to make with those examples is to provide examples throughout history that a simple concept with no basis in reality (that still may wind up being true for all we know) has led to major tragedies and transgressions of human rights.
The way I see it, and I think many people would agree, is that the reason for doing something is equally as important as the result of doing it. However, an unverifiable concept being not only a minor influence, but often an overriding factor in many decisions that have led to terrible outcomes is no good reason for the outcomes they led to. God told me to kill those people, God told me to enslave this inferior race, God told me I had to save the world... these are no better than saying that The Catcher in the Rye told you to kill John Lennon, or that your belief that Jews are evil and control the world's economy is what led you to systematically exterminate them. Personal beliefs that have no way of being verified simply don't cut it when it comes to giving a reason why you did something evil.
I'm the type that prefers to treat everything the same unless there is some good reason stating why things shouldn't be that way. I like to have an open mind, and I prefer that the least amount of freedom be afforded in favor of "security" or "safety" be taken. I'm also very pragmatic, if something isn't practical, and doesn't have a good reason for being impractical, it doesn't make sense. I have no problem with people believing in God, my family believes in God, I believe in God in a very unassuming and simple way (much different than any institutionalized religion), and I know and am friends with many people that both believe and do not believe in God. I think that religion (or rather certain religions) at its core actually has positive values to offer society, but unfortunately for those values, they are greatly overshadowed by the negative values it imposes on society. Most of the negative values can be accounted for by sheer ignorance alone, but human nature ruins any good that institutionalized religion has to offer. If religion were a purely personal matter, without a set of politics to go with it, it would be another story. Too many believers focus on what others are doing, and how wrong it is. If they could simply mind their own business (which honestly they need to take a look at themselves first, I'm sure they'll find somebody just as flawed as the person that they were criticizing, ostracizing, or damning), no one would have a problem. When it comes to Christianity, at least in America, too many people don't even know what their own Bible says. Neither do the atheists quoting it and demonizing it, but to be fair, the Christians without a clue bring it on themselves for not knowing. The Old Testament is the Old Testament for a reason. The New Testament at its most basic is about atonement. The whole point is to quit stoning sinners, to quit hating each other and wronging each other, treat each other how we'd treat ourselves, and to forgive each other for the wrongs we have committed in the past. I don't know enough about other religions to really comment on them beyond my major points of not letting the unverifiable concept of God influence how society treats people.
With so many different perspectives on who and what God is, and what he says, there is no place for God except in the hearts and minds of those who believe in Him. So, do you see my point farwhen? Do you agree with me? If not, why is what you believe any different than a tyrannical government imposing its will on its people? What possible reason other than "it's God we're talking about" that makes dictating what others can and cannot do more than, well, a dictatorship?
|
|
Bookmarks