• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 18 of 18

    Thread: B.C. and A.D.

    1. #1
      Member Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze Tagger First Class 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Jesus of Suburbia's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      LD Count
      192837465
      Gender
      Posts
      1,309
      Likes
      248

      B.C. and A.D.

      What do B.C. and A.D. stand for if you're an atheist?? I know that there's something....

    2. #2
      Member Vampyre's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Ontario Canada
      Posts
      285
      Likes
      1
      BC stands for "before Christ." AD actually stands for the Latin phrase "anno domini" which means "in the year of our Lord." This doesn't really change even if you're an atheist. It's simply intended as a point in time to use for reference.

      EDIT: AD can also be referred to as CE (Common Era) if that helps. In that case, it'd be BCE / CE.

    3. #3
      Drowning in Dreams Achievements:
      Made lots of Friends on DV Vivid Dream Journal Veteran First Class 10000 Hall Points Created Dream Journal
      <span class='glow_8B0000'>Zhaylin</span>'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      LD Count
      c. 6 since join
      Gender
      Location
      Central West Virginia, USA
      Posts
      5,772
      Likes
      4724
      DJ Entries
      199
      Yeah, Vamp... Jehovah's Witnesses use BCE and CE and it seems to be gaining popularity elsewhere too.

      To me, A.D. always meant "After Death" lol. I've known practically all my life that it doesn't really mean that, but I can never remember the latin to save my life.

    4. #4
      Member Vampyre's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Ontario Canada
      Posts
      285
      Likes
      1
      I was confused about it for a while, because I thought: "If BC is 'before christ' and AD is 'after death' then what were the years in between called? When Jesus was alive." So I had to look it up to find out.

    5. #5
      Member evildoctor's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Chicagoland Burbs
      Posts
      245
      Likes
      46
      I do not use AD or BC on principle.

      The non xtian tends to prefer CE or (Common Era) and BCE (before common Era)

      I personally prefer to use EV - Eva Vulgaris - Latin for the same and it sounds more contemptuous.
      Last edited by evildoctor; 11-09-2009 at 08:13 PM.
      Every Man and Every Woman is a Star - There is no god but Man.

      The word of sin is restriction - Thou hast no right but to do what thy will.

    6. #6
      Member SpecialInterests's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Pangea Ultima
      Posts
      349
      Likes
      29
      Unfortunately no one has revised the way we count years since it was realized Jesus doesn't actually exist.

    7. #7
      This is my title. Licity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      632
      Likes
      2
      B.C. and A.D. stand for Before Christ and Anno Domini as stated above, but most atheists I know have no problem with using them. C.E. and B.C.E. are alternates for those that insist on being politically correct.
      198.726% of people will not realize that this percentage is impossible given what we are measuring. If you enjoy eating Monterey Jack cheese, put this in your sig and add 3^4i to the percentage listed.

    8. #8
      Member
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Gender
      Posts
      609
      Likes
      28
      I just use BC and AD even though I am agnostic. BCE/CE is just another result of our lame-ass politically correct culture.

      I personally wouldn't care if the system was based around the birth and death of a sheep named Dickface. It's just a way to refer to things.

    9. #9
      Member Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze Tagger First Class 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Jesus of Suburbia's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      LD Count
      192837465
      Gender
      Posts
      1,309
      Likes
      248
      Thanks. I've been using B.C. and A.D. all my life but want to start using C.E. and B.C.E. Thanks again!!

    10. #10
      Member
      Join Date
      Feb 2004
      Posts
      5,165
      Likes
      711
      Most people will agree that he did exist, atleast in the sense that he was a real person who was born in that time.

    11. #11
      .. / .- –– / .- .-. guitarboy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2008
      LD Count
      Over 9000
      Gender
      Location
      Homeward Bound
      Posts
      1,571
      Likes
      49
      Quote Originally Posted by Vampyre View Post
      I was confused about it for a while, because I thought: "If BC is 'before christ' and AD is 'after death' then what were the years in between called? When Jesus was alive." So I had to look it up to find out.
      I don't see why Atheists wouldn't use it, it's just a reference, you don't have to believe anything.

    12. #12
      Credo ut intelligam Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Noogah's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      1,527
      Likes
      138
      Quote Originally Posted by Alric View Post
      Most people will agree that he did exist, atleast in the sense that he was a real person who was born in that time.
      Yeah.

      Refusing to use terms like B.C and/or A.D because of their old implications seems a little...dare I say...radical?

      For one to flat out reject that there was indeed a man who lived named Jesus Christ is just going overboard. There was a man, and plenty of research has shown it. Weather or not you believe he was the son of God is up to you.
      John 3:16

      For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    13. #13
      Banned
      Join Date
      May 2007
      LD Count
      Loads
      Gender
      Location
      Digital Forest.
      Posts
      6,864
      Likes
      386
      Okay, if you are going to argue that there was once a man named Iesus who lived in Palestine 2,000 years ago, then yes, there were many, in fact. But to say that there was one who was a prophetic figure with a large following is a bit absurd, as the bible is really the only 'historical' account of this. Basically, no other historian heard about this man except for a couple gentiles in Palestine who waited a few hundred years to write any of the guy's story down. (PS Christ is a title not a name)

    14. #14
      Credo ut intelligam Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Noogah's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      1,527
      Likes
      138
      Quote Originally Posted by A Roxxor View Post
      Okay, if you are going to argue that there was once a man named Iesus who lived in Palestine 2,000 years ago, then yes, there were many, in fact. But to say that there was one who was a prophetic figure with a large following is a bit absurd, as the bible is really the only 'historical' account of this. Basically, no other historian heard about this man except for a couple gentiles in Palestine who waited a few hundred years to write any of the guy's story down. (PS Christ is a title not a name)
      Oh, you mean other then the work done by Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, and Roman historian Carius Cornelius Tacitus?

      The Babylonian Talmud, Suetonius another Roman historian? Phlegon the Greek historian? Lucian of Samosata? Mara Bar-Serapion the Syrian stoic philosopher?

      I wonder why so many martyrs died in the first century A.D. Thousands will not die for the sake of a lie.

      Also, it's spelled Iesous.
      John 3:16

      For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    15. #15
      Member evildoctor's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Chicagoland Burbs
      Posts
      245
      Likes
      46
      Quote Originally Posted by A Roxxor View Post
      Okay, if you are going to argue that there was once a man named Iesus who lived in Palestine 2,000 years ago, then yes, there were many, in fact. But to say that there was one who was a prophetic figure with a large following is a bit absurd, as the bible is really the only 'historical' account of this. Basically, no other historian heard about this man except for a couple gentiles in Palestine who waited a few hundred years to write any of the guy's story down. (PS Christ is a title not a name)
      Actually I did some research once on an orthodox Jewish site. They had a couple of "possible" candidates for Jesus. One was a travelling rabbi called Jesus something or the other that roamed around on a donkey and had a small following before the romans killed him for being a preachy SOB. There were a few others as well.

      The Jewish web site was proposing that Jesus was an amalgam. A bit like the Robin Hood legend from England. There was a Robert of Loxley - but his deeds probably got merged together with a bunch of other local tales about local outlaws and bandits until Robin Hood became the larger than life character we know him as today.

      Same as Jesus. Take the combined stories of these 3 or so possible travelling rabbi Jesuses. Borrow some "miracles" from Mithras and Zoroasterism, add in a virgin birth - borrowed of course from any number of preceding pagan systems such as the greeks, egyptians, others. Add in a resurection having hid/eaten the body. Spread the whole thing by word of mouth, adding to the story a little at each telling, and LO a religion is born.
      Last edited by evildoctor; 11-11-2009 at 08:23 PM.
      Every Man and Every Woman is a Star - There is no god but Man.

      The word of sin is restriction - Thou hast no right but to do what thy will.

    16. #16
      Banned
      Join Date
      May 2007
      LD Count
      Loads
      Gender
      Location
      Digital Forest.
      Posts
      6,864
      Likes
      386
      Exactly. He didn't exist at all.

    17. #17
      Credo ut intelligam Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Noogah's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      1,527
      Likes
      138
      Quote Originally Posted by A Roxxor View Post
      Exactly. He didn't exist at all.
      Apparently you took no notice of this:

      Quote Originally Posted by Noogah
      Oh, you mean other then the work done by Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, and Roman historian Carius Cornelius Tacitus?

      The Babylonian Talmud, Suetonius another Roman historian? Phlegon the Greek historian? Lucian of Samosata? Mara Bar-Serapion the Syrian stoic philosopher?

      I wonder why so many martyrs died in the first century A.D. Thousands will not die for the sake of a lie.

      Also, it's spelled Iesous.
      As my signature implies, I will be leaving this evening. Goodbye A roxxor! I hope I can leave on friendly terms.
      John 3:16

      For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    18. #18
      Banned
      Join Date
      May 2007
      LD Count
      Loads
      Gender
      Location
      Digital Forest.
      Posts
      6,864
      Likes
      386
      I prefer the latin spelling. After all, they were in that area during the time.

      Also, I don't think anyone cares you're leaving. Good riddance imo.
      Last edited by A Roxxor; 11-11-2009 at 11:53 PM.

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •