• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 5 of 5
    Like Tree4Likes
    • 4 Post By Nick89

    Thread: Theist/atheist - a mere game of ego

    1. #1
      Member
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      LD Count
      1 :) finally:)
      Posts
      79
      Likes
      13

      Theist/atheist - a mere game of ego

      Some four years ago, so I was 16 by then, I slowly began to realise that whether I say I believe in God or I don't, it will evoke a false image of myself in other people. I also realised being a theist or an atheist, generally speaking - religious beliefs (sic!) don't have much to do with spirituality. Look at the society. In Poland, my homeland, for example, 90 percent of citizens are catholics. And yet the society is soooooo spiritual and sublime, no crime, no hatred, no materialism, etc.

      I don't believe in God as such, as Holy Trinity, I don't pray, don't go to Church. But I'm pretty sure, Jesus was one of the greatest sages in human history, I do believe that miracles he made were real. I do believe in soul, spirit and I believe in the power of 'the good', the power of love. This is what allowed Jesus to make miracles, to my mind; it has nothing to do with the specific name JHWH, or whatever.
      I believe in the words of Jesus, he was a wise man, in Bible being a source of great wisdom, however, I also believe in chakras, for that matter.
      I do put my faith in 'God', however, who that God is, I don't know, not a person, not a thing. When something bad happens to me, I don't say 'world is bad, God doesn't exist' but I try to accept that what happened simply had to happen in order to teach me something.
      I could say both 'I believe in God' - I believe in love, and 'I don't believe in God - the concept of a God that has a specific name and of a specific religion being more right then the other is absurd to me.

      All religions are equally true and equally false, it is only how you treat them and what you learn from them that is important!

      Life is not 1 or 0, not theist or atheist, etc., these are only mental constructs which serve for the ego to inhance it's sense of identity.

      Here's an excellent text about the topic. An excerpt from the book 'A New Earth' by Eckhart Tolle.

      Read it carefully and I hope some of you become aware of what they are really doing when they argue wheter God exist or not, etc. I just feel like vomiting when I look at a spiritual forum and all I notice is endless dispute between two parties: theists and atheists.


      Truth: Relative or Absolute

      Beyond the realm of simple and verifiable facts, the certainty that “I
      am right and you are wrong” is a dangerous thing in personal relationships as
      well as in interactions between nations, tribes, religions, and so on.
      But if the belief “I am right; you are wrong” is one of the ways in
      which the ego strengthens itself, if making yourself right and others wrong is
      a mental dysfunction that perpetuates separation and conflict between
      human beings, does that mean there is no such thing as right or wrong
      behavior, action, or belief? And wouldn't that be the moral relativism that
      some contemporary Christian teachings see as the great evil of our times?
      The history of Christianity is, of course, a prime example of how the
      belief that you are in sole possession of the truth, that is to say, right , can
      corrupt your actions and behavior to the point of insanity. For centuries,
      torturing and burning people alive if their opinion diverged even in the
      slightest from Church doctrine or narrow interpretations of scripture (the
      “Truth”) was considered right because the victims were “wrong.” They were
      so wrong that they needed to be killed. The Truth was considered more
      important than human life. And what was the Truth? A story you had to
      believe in; which means, a bundle of thoughts.
      The one million people that mad dictator Pol Pot of Cambodia ordered
      killed included everybody who wore glasses. Why? To him, the Marxist
      interpretation of history was the absolute truth, and according to his version
      of it, those who wore glasses belonged to the educated glass, the bourgeoisie,
      the exploiters of the peasants. They needed to be eliminated to make room
      for a new social order. His truth also was a bundle of thoughts.
      The Catholic and other churches are actually correct when they
      identify relativism, the belief that there is no absolute truth to guide human
      behavior, as one of the evils of our times; but you won't find absolute truth if
      you look for it where it cannot be found: in doctrines, ideologies, sets of
      rules, or stories. What do all of these have in common? They are made up of
      thought. Thought can at best point to the truth, but it never is the truth. That's
      why Buddhists say “The finger pointing to the moon is not the moon.” All
      religions are equally false and equally true, depending on how you use them.
      You can use them in the service of the ego, or you can use them in the
      service of the Truth. If you believe only your religion is the Truth, you are
      using it in the service of the ego. used in such a way, religion becomes
      ideology and creates an illusory sense of superiority as well as division and
      conflict between people. In the service of the Truth, religious teachings
      represent signposts or maps left behind by awakened humans to assist you in
      spiritual awakening, that is to say, in becoming free of identification with
      form.
      There is only one absolute Truth, and all other truths emanate from it.
      When you find that Truth, your actions will be in alignment with it. Human
      action can reflect the Truth, or it can reflect illusion. Can the Truth be put
      into words? Yes, but the words are, of course, not it. They only point to it.
      The Truth is inseparable from who you are. Yes, you are the truth. If
      you look for it elsewhere, you will be deceived every time. The very Being
      that you are is Truth. Jesus tried to convey that when he said, “I am the way
      and the truth and the life.”2 These words uttered by Jesus are one of the most
      powerful and direct pointers to the Truth, if understood correctly. If
      misinterpreted, however, they become a great obstacle. Jesus speaks of the
      innermost I Am, the essence identity of every man and woman, every lifeform,
      in fact. He speaks of the life that you are. Some Christian mystics have
      called it the Christ within; Buddhists call it your Buddha nature; for Hindus,
      it is Atman, the indwelling God. When you are in touch with that dimension
      within yourself – and being in touch with it is your natural state, not some
      miraculous achievement – all your actions and relationships will reflect the
      oneness with all life that you sense deep within. This is love. Laws,
      commandments, rules, and regulations are necessary for those who are cut
      off from who they are, the Truth within. They prevent the worst excesses of
      the ego, and often they don't even do that. “Love and do what you will,” said
      St. Augustine. Words cannot get much closer to the Truth than that.

    2. #2
      Member Scatterbrain's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Posts
      1,729
      Likes
      91
      I don't understand how love has anything to do with the veracity of a religious system.

      Some religion may have some truth in them, but that doesn't mean all beliefs are "equally true". As far as objective facts go they're for the most part all myth. (Jesus didn't exist, no miracles, etc)
      Last edited by Scatterbrain; 03-13-2010 at 02:56 PM.
      - Are you an idiot?
      - No sir, I'm a dreamer.

    3. #3
      Member Photolysis's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Gender
      Posts
      1,270
      Likes
      316
      This thread's title is a perfect example of people trying to use words and phrases to sound smart, but failing utterly by misusing them.

      Atheism/Theism is nothing related to the ego, it is a stance on whether you believe in the existence of god(s).

      All religions are equally true and equally false, it is only how you treat them and what you learn from them that is important!
      Complete BS. This is like saying a flat earth and spherical earth are equally true and false. This is incorrect; one is more accurate than the other.

      Religions make factual claims. These claims MUST have an actual answer, regardless of whether anyone can know that answer. Therefore some religions will be closer to this answer than others, and some will be even further.

      They are not equally right and equally wrong.

      Life is not 1 or 0, not theist or atheist, etc., these are only mental constructs which serve for the ego to inhance it's sense of identity.
      No, some things in life are not black or white. Some things are.

      Atheism is not an ego-enhancing mental construct, it is a lack of a belief in deities. This lack of belief is regretfully important even in this era hence why it even has a name in the first place.

    4. #4
      Member
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      LD Count
      1 :) finally:)
      Posts
      79
      Likes
      13
      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      This thread's title is a perfect example of people trying to use words and phrases to sound smart, but failing utterly by misusing them.

      Atheism/Theism is nothing related to the ego, it is a stance on whether you believe in the existence of god(s).
      Atheism/Theism, good/bad, right/wrong is EVERYTHING related to the ego. Either you didn't read the excerpt I gave or didn't understand it. And the last thing I would do is to using terms I don't know to sound smart, believe me.

      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Complete BS. This is like saying a flat earth and spherical earth are equally true and false. This is incorrect; one is more accurate than the other.
      I agree in here: flat earth - incorrect, spherical earth - correct, obviously. Similarly, proton is heavier then electron - correct. And so on.

      But...

      'God exists? God doesn't exist?' What is God? What does it mean to exist? Does for example 'hatred' exist? Does 'compassion' exist?
      I admit, however, I was a bit imprecise, or rather, I thought only of the spiritual aspects of each religion when I talked about all religions being equally true and false. What I'm getting at is that this 'surface' content of each religion, which are dogmas, giving a God this or that name, etc. doesn't matter. Of course, one can apply values 'true' or 'false' to some of the surface content, usually, like 'Jesus existed' - either he existed or not. 'God's name is Jehova' - who is God? How can we ever know?. However, all this 'surface' content, what you believe in, mental concepts in your mind, doesn't really matter, all that matters is simply how you act, how you apply these rules in practice. To be honest, it makes no difference to me whether Jesus existed or not, what is important is his words, the same with Buddha, and so on. There is infinite wisdom in the words of these sages, it's all that matters.

      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Religions make factual claims. These claims MUST have an actual answer, regardless of whether anyone can know that answer. Therefore some religions will be closer to this answer than others, and some will be even further.

      They are not equally right and equally wrong.
      Agreed. These factual claims, which I call 'surface' content, are unimportant. This is the cover, the surface, on which most people focus, forgetting about that what is really iportant - the inside.

      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      [No, some things in life are not black or white. Some things are.
      Agreed, once again. It is important, however, to distinguish between those that can only be completely black or white and those that don't have this quality.. Jesus existed, Buddha existed - yeah, true or false, black or white. Jesus was closer to Truth than Buddha, or the other way round, it is more correct to believe in Holy Trinity than in Śiwa, etc. - not true, not false.


      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Atheism is not an ego-enhancing mental construct, it is a lack of a belief in deities. This lack of belief is regretfully important even in this era hence why it even has a name in the first place.
      You misunderstood me. I know what is theism, and what is atheism.
      What I claim is that both theism and atheism are an ego-enhancing mental construct, both egoism and altruism are an ego-enhancing mental construct, both boasting and trying to be modest are just ego-enhancers, so on, as strange as it sounds.

      There is truth. All words and beliefs can do, is point to it, but never can a thought be the truth.

      Bddha: 'Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love; this is the eternal rule.'
      Jesus: 'But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you'

      Quite similar... And, you know it's true, and I know, and everyone. Your rationalizing mind may tell you it's absurd, possibly because it is driven by the ego, who needs to be separate, to have enemies, in order to have a stronger identity. But you know it deep inside: have you ever benefited from hatred?

      I hope I made myself clear now. The last post was a bit unprecise.
      Last edited by Nick89; 03-13-2010 at 04:46 PM.

    5. #5
      Member really's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Posts
      2,676
      Likes
      56
      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      This thread's title is a perfect example of people trying to use words and phrases to sound smart, but failing utterly by misusing them.

      Atheism/Theism is nothing related to the ego, it is a stance on whether you believe in the existence of god(s).
      Nick's explaining how they are egoistic, which is not part of their actual definition. They're egoistic, dualistic terms for their emphasis in creating the illusory self.

      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Complete BS. This is like saying a flat earth and spherical earth are equally true and false. This is incorrect; one is more accurate than the other.

      Religions make factual claims. These claims MUST have an actual answer, regardless of whether anyone can know that answer. Therefore some religions will be closer to this answer than others, and some will be even further.

      They are not equally right and equally wrong.
      In terms of personal preference, religions are neither right nor wrong but only relatively. He's not talking about facts.

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •