For your own soul's sake, take off your clothes!

Printable View

07-14-2010, 01:53 AM
Tyler

For your own soul's sake, take off your clothes!

When God first made Adam out of dirt, Adam was naked. When God made Eve out of a bone from Adam's ribs, she was naked. Adam and Eve lived happily for a short while in the Garden, skyclad, with not a shred of clothing to speak of. But then, Satan, in the guise of a serpent, tricked Eve into biting the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. Then she had Adam try a bite. It was not until wicked Satan had them eat from the tree that they realized that they were nude. Clothing is a direct result of Satan's trickery. Had it not been for Satan, clothing would not exist, clothing is evil! It isn't clearly stated in the bible, but you must read between the lines, not all messages are completely obvious. To wear clothes is sinful! If you want to make it to heaven and live everlasting life with our lord God and his son Jesus, you will cast off your clothes, and never wear clothes again!
07-14-2010, 02:06 AM
XeL

Preach it, brother! Preach it to all female sinners!
07-14-2010, 02:10 AM
♥Mark

But that's icky.
07-14-2010, 06:18 AM
Sekhmet

What if it's cold where I live? Clothes are practical if it's goddamned cold. Am I sinning if I don't want hypothermia?
07-14-2010, 07:21 AM
username695

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sekhmet

What if it's cold where I live? Clothes are practical if it's goddamned cold. Am I sinning if I don't want hypothermia?

Haha...
07-14-2010, 09:16 PM
Universal Mind

Strip clubs are centers of holiness. When I go to a strip club, it's all about God.

By the way, does God wear clothes? I don't think The Bible ever once mentions anything about God's clothing. He is naked, and he knows it. We are all being constantly watched by a naked man.
07-14-2010, 09:44 PM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Strip clubs are centers of holiness. When I go to a strip club, it's all about God.

By the way, does God wear clothes? I don't think The Bible ever once mentions anything about God's clothing. He is naked, and he knows it. We are all being constantly watched by a naked man.

I'm glad to see someone else is picking up on what I'm preaching here.

Not only is our Lord God naked and watching over us, but he wants us to get naked too.
07-14-2010, 10:06 PM
Spartiate

If God wanted to see his children running about in their birthday suits, he wouldn't have given us the gift of Shame. You should all be terribly disgusted by your bodies.
07-14-2010, 10:08 PM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartiate

If God wanted to see his children running about in their birthday suits, he wouldn't have given us the gift of Shame. You should all be terribly disgusted by your bodies.

But God didn't give us Shame, Adam and Eve inherited it when the Satan tricked them into eating from the tree of knowledge!
Shame is a direct result of Satan's meddling, thus is a sin! Do not be ashamed of your body!
07-15-2010, 12:22 AM
Saturos

Who wants to see a bunch of naked old people running around?
07-15-2010, 12:35 AM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saturos

Who wants to see a bunch of naked old people running around?

It is not a matter of what you want, but what God wants.
07-15-2010, 02:50 AM
Philosopher8659

Personally, having myself become, quite unaware as a matter of fact, a prophet (in training) I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth. So if It, whatever it was, wanted to stand on a soap box and preach non-sense, I would laugh at it, what ever it be, because believe it or not, It is not Holy because it is loved by God, it is love by God because it is Holy. What I have been told, by a fly as a matter of fact (or fiction, take your pick) that the whole idea of having a brain is to learn to use it. Now you can take your pick, learn judgment, or put words in Gods mouth, as if you have the hands to.

Now, try this on for size. If we are to become like "God" then it is up to us to "want." So I want me an Eve, with or without cloths--just as long as she actually has a brain. Either way, I can do the rest.
07-15-2010, 03:14 AM
♥Mark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth.

I'm not so sure about that.
07-15-2010, 03:27 AM
Philosopher8659

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark75

I'm not so sure about that.

I said he had the bigger mouth, I on the other hand have more indiscretion
07-15-2010, 04:07 AM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

Personally, having myself become, quite unaware as a matter of fact, a prophet (in training) I would think that between the two of us, me and God, God would have a much bigger mouth. So if It, whatever it was, wanted to stand on a soap box and preach non-sense, I would laugh at it, what ever it be, because believe it or not, It is not Holy because it is loved by God, it is love by God because it is Holy. What I have been told, by a fly as a matter of fact (or fiction, take your pick) that the whole idea of having a brain is to learn to use it. Now you can take your pick, learn judgment, or put words in Gods mouth, as if you have the hands to.

Now, try this on for size. If we are to become like "God" then it is up to us to "want." So I want me an Eve, with or without cloths--just as long as she actually has a brain. Either way, I can do the rest.

I actually kind of touched on the bit that I bolded.
If people would just use their brains, I wouldn't have to point out to them that wearing clothes is a sin. The would've figured that part out for themselves.
You however, do not seem to be using your brain. You say that you want an Eve, with or without clothes, as long as she has a brain.
I would much rather you get a naked Eve with no brain, then a clothed Eve, because a clothed Eve is doomed to hell, and her sinful ways may rub off on you.
07-15-2010, 09:57 AM
Philosopher8659

How do you then account for the sins of nakedness in the Laws and the fact that the Angles are given white robes? Or that God even made and desgined clothes? Or did you tear those pages out of the Book?

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

Myself, I would be under the impression that if a thing had a function, that the good was the virtue of the function, but the evil would be the dysfunction. However, fault is an entirely different matter as, the dysfunction of the eyes is evil, yet it may not be the fault of the blind--it is the fault of the eyes.

We are all thankful, however, of the number of people here on earth who are such intimates with whatever this God is, that they can tell you what is on his mind because He is too lame to tell us Himself. Kind of makes you special when you work for God, don't it? Those pages that help people identify a prophet, you will, however, definitly have to purge from the text. It is written there that one prophet would be sent, yet it appears that God cannot count for there are countless numbers of them.

I am certainly not up to working for anyone myself, but I do try to share the fruits of my labor--no charge, as I dont collect souls or butterflys. But now, I need to go and have a breakdown, contemplating what is going to happen to mankind should you actually read the entire text.

And as far as sin goes, I think it is written in several places in the text, I am Lucifer. This only means that I would rather have a woman who has lived in sin and came out with a strong desire for virtue, than one who is sinless with no desire at all. The one is life, and the other is not. Or how do you explain that the whore will eventually become the virgin? Is that not simply evolution for you?

Now, if there is anything you should have gotten out of Genesis 3 is not the latest dress fads, but the fact that Lucifer has and always will work with God--or so it is written.

1) He spoke in the name of the Lord.
2) What he said came to pass.
3) God confirmed his words.

Check the Law, what does that make him?
07-15-2010, 01:52 PM
Abra

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark75

I'm not so sure about that.

Could God create a mouth bigger than his? If not, He is not omnipotent. If so, he is not mouthpotent.

This paradox troubles me.
07-15-2010, 03:43 PM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

How do you then account for the sins of nakedness in the Laws and the fact that the Angles are given white robes? Or that God even made and desgined clothes? Or did you tear those pages out of the Book?

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

Myself, I would be under the impression that if a thing had a function, that the good was the virtue of the function, but the evil would be the dysfunction. However, fault is an entirely different matter as, the dysfunction of the eyes is evil, yet it may not be the fault of the blind--it is the fault of the eyes.

We are all thankful, however, of the number of people here on earth who are such intimates with whatever this God is, that they can tell you what is on his mind because He is too lame to tell us Himself. Kind of makes you special when you work for God, don't it? Those pages that help people identify a prophet, you will, however, definitly have to purge from the text. It is written there that one prophet would be sent, yet it appears that God cannot count for there are countless numbers of them.

I am certainly not up to working for anyone myself, but I do try to share the fruits of my labor--no charge, as I dont collect souls or butterflys. But now, I need to go and have a breakdown, contemplating what is going to happen to mankind should you actually read the entire text.

And as far as sin goes, I think it is written in several places in the text, I am Lucifer. This only means that I would rather have a woman who has lived in sin and came out with a strong desire for virtue, than one who is sinless with no desire at all. The one is life, and the other is not. Or how do you explain that the whore will eventually become the virgin? Is that not simply evolution for you?

Now, if there is anything you should have gotten out of Genesis 3 is not the latest dress fads, but the fact that Lucifer has and always will work with God--or so it is written.

1) He spoke in the name of the Lord.
2) What he said came to pass.
3) God confirmed his words.

Check the Law, what does that make him?

Oh my God you are right!
This will be my last post on these forums. I am going to live in the wild with the animals that God originally populated this earth with.

Goodbye Dreamviews, it's been fun.
07-15-2010, 03:49 PM
Philosopher8659

PS, don't forget to take a flashlight with you. They are excellent both for finding nymphs and snipes.

Oh, and the original animals, they died a couple days ago.
07-24-2010, 04:34 AM
horsey101

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

And why not take it all the way? God did not create them in a house either, therefore it is a sin to live in a house, after all, a house is just looser fitting clothes. And damn, now I remember, they were not created with internet either! Man, your going straight to hell! And you gots lots of company--because heaven has a vacant for sale sign on it.

This "interpretation" of the Bible opposes clothes being worn for reasons of modesty, not for shelter from the environment. The OP's point was: don't cover up your body out of shame of being naked. I fail to see how houses and the internet became involved.

This is really random, but what exactly do you do for a living?
07-24-2010, 04:41 AM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by horsey101

This "interpretation" of the Bible opposes clothes being worn for reasons of modesty, not for shelter from the environment. The OP's point was: don't cover up your body out of shame of being naked. I fail to see how houses and the internet became involved.

Are you sure you read the OP? My point had nothing to do with modesty or shame.
My point is clothes are evil, they are a direct result of Satan's trickery.
07-26-2010, 01:37 AM
Jesus of Suburbia

I think this rule only applies to women.
Amen.
07-27-2010, 06:38 PM
Mike02

This is why I hate religion.
07-28-2010, 03:46 AM
Jesus of Suburbia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike02

This is why I hate religion.

I hope you realize that the OP isn't serious.
07-28-2010, 04:03 AM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus of Suburbia

I hope you realize that the OP isn't serious.

What are you talking about?
I am completely serious.
My middle name is serious.
Seriously.
07-28-2010, 04:04 AM
Jesus of Suburbia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyler

What are you talking about?
I am completely serious.
My middle name is serious.
Seriously.

Will the Real Slim Shady please stand up?
07-28-2010, 04:05 AM
Tyler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus of Suburbia

Will the Real Slim Shady please stand up?

Slim is here?
omfgwhere?
07-28-2010, 04:11 AM
Jesus of Suburbia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyler

Slim is here?
omfgwhere?

Guess who's back? Back again? Shady's back. Tell a friend.
Guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, guess who's back, nanana mna mna mna mna mmMmm mna mna mna mna mmMmm
07-28-2010, 04:20 AM
kookyinc

Finally, an excuse to be naked in public. If I get arrested, it's imposing on my freedom of religion.
07-28-2010, 04:33 AM
Jesus of Suburbia

Quote:

Originally Posted by kookyinc

Finally, an excuse to be naked in public. If I get arrested, it's imposing on my freedom of religion.

In the words of the great Marshall Mathers,
"Now I'm in jail and/I'd dunno what happened/they say I was/running butt-naked/screaming/'Ah Ah Ah Ah!'/all I know is/I'm not guilty/they say/'Save it boy/We've got you on tape/yellin at an old lady/'Touch my body'""
07-28-2010, 05:02 AM
p0k3ts1z3

god specifically gave them clothing and instructed them to wear it. if anything clothing is righteous
07-28-2010, 05:14 AM
kookyinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by p0k3ts1z3

god specifically gave them clothing and instructed them to wear it. if anything clothing is righteous

No.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genesis 3:6-11

When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves. Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden. 9 But the LORD God called to the man, "Where are you?" He answered, "I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid. And he said, "Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?"

Spoiler for Me being an arrogant twat:

I love being an atheist yet schooling people on the Bible.
07-28-2010, 06:00 AM
p0k3ts1z3

Quote:

Originally Posted by kookyinc

No.

Spoiler for Me being an arrogant twat:

I love being an atheist yet schooling people on the Bible.

Actually, the bible continues to say in Gen 3-21 "The Lord God made clothing from the hides of the animals for Adam and his wife to ware."
07-28-2010, 02:54 PM
kookyinc

Quote:

Originally Posted by p0k3ts1z3

Actually, the bible continues to say in Gen 3-21 "The Lord God made clothing from the hides of the animals for Adam and his wife to ware."

So he did, but he didn't "specifically [give] them clothing and [instruct] them to wear it." Humans made clothes first, and I interpret Genesis 3:21 to mean that God was merely giving their clothes a bit of an upgrade. After all, leaves are a really crappy material for clothing.
07-28-2010, 03:11 PM
p0k3ts1z3

you seem to think we somehow threaded leaves together into a garment like in the movies, now we were holding bunches of leaves to cover our butts in shame of god seeing that we are naked. and so god (made) the clothing, (gave) them to us, and (instructed) us to wear it, we never had any in the first place. and please read the bible before using it out of context.